Strom D J
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA, USA.
Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2003;105(1-4):339-40. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.rpd.a006253.
Routine bioassay programmes sometimes find evidence of an unsuspected intake. If there were no workplace indicators of exposure or intake, it is necessary to assume a value for the time of intake. Under these circumstances, the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) continues to recommend using the midpoint of the interval between routine bioassay measurements (ICRP Publication 78, paragraph 106). The assumption of T/2 as the time of intake, where T is the interval between bioassay measurements, represents the expectation value of the time of intake, (t), assuming uniform probability of an intake at any given time. This assumption results in a modest bias, of the expectation value of the intake, (I), that would have been received by a population of workers who had uniform probability over time of intake. This underestimation leads to a negative or positive bias in dose estimates derived in this fashion. The bias is characterised for realistic, routine urinalysis programs for Pu, U and 3H, as well as for in vivo measurements of 125I, 131I and 137Cs. Simple numerical methods are presented for correcting the bias. The bias is greatest for radionuclides whose half-lives are short with respect to the interval between bioassay measurements. Since the primary concern is estimating intake rather than time, the assumed time of intake should be chosen as t(I) rather than T/2. The ICRP should consider revising some of the tables in its Publication 78 to reflect this.
常规生物测定程序有时会发现未被怀疑的摄入量证据。如果没有工作场所的暴露或摄入量指标,就有必要为摄入量时间假定一个值。在这种情况下,国际放射防护委员会(ICRP)继续建议使用常规生物测定测量间隔的中点(ICRP第78号出版物,第106段)。假定摄入量时间为T/2(其中T是生物测定测量之间的间隔),代表摄入量时间(t)的期望值,假定在任何给定时间摄入量的概率是均匀的。这个假定导致摄入量期望值(I)出现适度偏差,对于随时间摄入量概率均匀的工人群体来说本应接收到该摄入量。这种低估会导致以这种方式得出的剂量估计值出现负偏差或正偏差。针对钚、铀和氚的实际常规尿液分析程序以及针对125I、131I和137Cs的体内测量,对该偏差进行了特征描述。给出了校正偏差的简单数值方法。对于半衰期相对于生物测定测量间隔较短的放射性核素,偏差最大。由于主要关注的是估计摄入量而非时间,应选择假定的摄入量时间为t(I)而非T/2。ICRP应考虑修订其第78号出版物中的一些表格以反映这一点。