Murphy Kathleen, Hafez Michael, Philips Juliet, Yarnell Kellie, Gutshall Kevin, Berg Karin
Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21287, USA.
Mol Diagn. 2003;7(1):35-40. doi: 10.1007/BF03260018.
The Factor V Leiden mutation (G1691A) is a clinically important polymorphism that results in an increased risk of thrombosis. The goal of this study was to compare a temperature gradient capillary electrophoresis (TGCE) platform for the detection of Factor V gene mutations to a conventional restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) assay.
Three hundred and four samples were analyzed by both TGCE and a common clinical Mnl I/RFLP assay. Concordance of results between the two assays was observed for 302/304 (99.3%) of the samples.
All of the Leiden mutants (23/23, 100%) were identified by TGCE. Of the two discrepant results, one was caused by low peak heights in the TGCE output data and was easily rectified by the addition of a minimum peak height threshold. The second discrepancy resulted from the presence of a G-->A transition 95 bp downstream of the Leiden mutation site. This polymorphism represents a previously unreported alteration of the Factor V gene.
The TGCE assay is less labor-intensive and has a higher throughput capacity than the Mnl I/RFLP assay. TGCE is a less specific assay than the Mnl I/RFLP assay that allows for the detection of novel polymorphisms, but also creates the need for all positive TGCE results to be confirmed by an alternate method such as sequencing. Our results demonstrate that TGCE is a highly sensitive method for mutation detection and has utility for mutation discovery analysis.
凝血因子V莱顿突变(G1691A)是一种具有临床重要意义的多态性,会增加血栓形成风险。本研究的目的是比较用于检测凝血因子V基因突变的温度梯度毛细管电泳(TGCE)平台与传统的限制性片段长度多态性(RFLP)分析方法。
采用TGCE和常见的临床Mnl I/RFLP分析方法对304份样本进行分析。两种分析方法对302/304(99.3%)的样本结果具有一致性。
所有莱顿突变体(23/23,100%)均通过TGCE检测到。在两个不一致的结果中,一个是由于TGCE输出数据中的峰高较低,通过添加最小峰高阈值很容易纠正。第二个差异是由于在莱顿突变位点下游95 bp处存在G→A转换。这种多态性代表了凝血因子V基因以前未报道的改变。
与Mnl I/RFLP分析相比,TGCE分析劳动强度较小且通量更高。TGCE分析比Mnl I/RFLP分析特异性更低,它能够检测新的多态性,但也需要通过诸如测序等替代方法对所有阳性TGCE结果进行确认。我们的结果表明,TGCE是一种高度灵敏的突变检测方法,在突变发现分析中具有实用性。