Suppr超能文献

静脉注射昂丹司琼多剂量方案与两种单剂量方案预防顺铂引起的恶心和呕吐的分层、随机、双盲比较

Stratified, randomized, double-blind comparison of intravenous ondansetron administered as a multiple-dose regimen versus two single-dose regimens in the prevention of cisplatin-induced nausea and vomiting.

作者信息

Beck T M, Hesketh P J, Madajewicz S, Navari R M, Pendergrass K, Lester E P, Kish J A, Murphy W K, Hainsworth J D, Gandara D R

机构信息

Mountain States Tumor Institute, Boise, ID 82712-6297.

出版信息

J Clin Oncol. 1992 Dec;10(12):1969-75. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1992.10.12.1969.

Abstract

PURPOSE

This study compares the efficacy and safety of two single-dose regimens with the approved three-dose regimen of ondansetron in the prevention of cisplatin-induced emesis.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This multicenter study was a stratified, randomized, double-blind, and parallel group design. Chemotherapy-naive inpatients were randomized to receive intravenous (IV) ondansetron (Zofran; Glaxo Inc, Research Triangle Park, NC) 0.15 mg/kg times three doses, every 4 hours or a single 8-mg or 32-mg dose followed by two saline doses that began 30 minutes before cisplatin administration. Cisplatin (high-dose > or = 100 mg/m2 or medium-dose 50 to 70 mg/m2) was given as a single infusion (< or = 3 hours). Patients were monitored for emetic episodes, adverse events, and laboratory safety parameters for 24 hours after cisplatin administration.

RESULTS

A total of 699 patients (359 high-dose, 340 medium-dose) were enrolled. Of these, 618 were assessable for efficacy (15 ineligible, 66 protocol deviations). The 32-mg dose was superior to the 8-mg single dose with regard to total number of emetic episodes (high-dose, P = .015; medium-dose, P < .001), complete response (no emetic episodes: high-dose, 48% v 35%; P = .048; medium-dose, 73% v 50%; P = .001) and failure rate (> 5 emetic episodes, withdrawn or rescued: high-dose, 20% v 34%; P = .018; medium-dose, 9% v 23%; P = .005). The 32-mg single dose was also superior to the 0.15 mg/kg times three dose regimen with regard to total number of emetic episodes (medium-dose, P = .033) and failure rate (high-dose, 20% v 36%; P = .009; medium-dose, 9% v 22%; P = .011). Ondansetron was well tolerated. The most common adverse event was headache. An approximate 10-fold increase in the incidence of clinically significant transaminase elevations was observed in the high-dose versus medium-dose cisplatin strata (aspartate aminotransferase [AST], 6.5% v 0.7%; serum alanine aminotransferase [ALT], 5.0% v 0.3%).

CONCLUSION

A 32-mg single dose of ondansetron is more effective than a single 8-mg dose and is at least as effective as the standard regimen of 0.15 mg/kg times three doses in the prevention of cisplatin-induced acute emesis.

摘要

目的

本研究比较两种单剂量方案与已批准的昂丹司琼三剂量方案预防顺铂所致呕吐的疗效和安全性。

患者与方法

本多中心研究采用分层、随机、双盲和平行组设计。未接受过化疗的住院患者被随机分为静脉注射(IV)昂丹司琼(佐芬;葛兰素公司,北卡罗来纳州三角研究园)0.15mg/kg,每4小时一次,共三剂,或单次8mg或32mg剂量,随后两剂生理盐水,在顺铂给药前30分钟开始。顺铂(高剂量≥100mg/m²或中剂量50至70mg/m²)单次输注(≤3小时)。在顺铂给药后24小时监测患者的呕吐发作、不良事件和实验室安全参数。

结果

共纳入699例患者(359例高剂量,340例中剂量)。其中,618例可评估疗效(15例不符合条件,66例违反方案)。在呕吐发作总数方面(高剂量,P = 0.015;中剂量,P < 0.001)、完全缓解率(无呕吐发作:高剂量,48%对35%;P = 0.048;中剂量,73%对50%;P = 0.001)和失败率(>5次呕吐发作、退出或解救:高剂量,20%对34%;P = 0.018;中剂量:9%对23%;P = 0.005)方面,32mg剂量优于8mg单剂量。在呕吐发作总数方面(中剂量,P = 0.033)和失败率方面(高剂量,20%对36%;P = 0.009;中剂量,9%对22%;P = 0.011),32mg单剂量也优于0.15mg/kg三剂量方案。昂丹司琼耐受性良好。最常见的不良事件是头痛。高剂量顺铂组与中剂量顺铂组相比,临床显著转氨酶升高的发生率约增加10倍(天冬氨酸转氨酶[AST],6.5%对0.7%;血清丙氨酸转氨酶[ALT],5.0%对0.3%)。

结论

32mg单剂量昂丹司琼预防顺铂所致急性呕吐比单次8mg剂量更有效,且至少与0.15mg/kg三剂量标准方案效果相当。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验