Ahn M J, Lee J S, Lee K H, Suh C, Choi S S, Kim S H
Department of Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Ulsan, Seoul, Korea.
Am J Clin Oncol. 1994 Apr;17(2):150-6. doi: 10.1097/00000421-199404000-00012.
To compare the effectiveness and side effects of antiemetic regimens using ondansetron alone (O) versus ondansetron plus dexamethasone (OD) versus ondansetron plus dexamethasone plus lorazepam (ODA) in the prevention of emesis induced by cisplatin-based chemotherapy.
Randomized, double-blind trial.
In this study, 75 patients who were receiving cisplatin (60 mg/m2) on day 1 and 5-fluorouracil (1,000 mg/m2) on day 2 to day 6 were enrolled. Patients were randomized to one of three treatment regimens: O, OD, or ODA. The patients assigned to O regimen received ondansetron 8 mg intravenously as a loading dose 15 minutes prior to cisplatin, then 1 mg/h continuous i.v. infusion (24 mg/day) for 48 hours. OD regimen consisted of ondansetron given as above plus dexamethasone administered at a dose of 10 mg i.v. injection every 12 hours for 3 days. ODA regimen was OD regimen plus lorazepam administered at a dose of 0.5 mg orally every 6 hours for 3 days. To ensure blinding, O group patients received 10 ml placebo-saline i.v. injection every 12 hours for 3 days, and O and OD group patients received placebo tablets orally every 6 hours for 3 days.
One patient did not receive assigned antiemetic regimen and was excluded from the analysis. In the acute phase, complete control of emesis was seen in 85% of all patients, and there was no significant difference among the three groups (p = .442). Complete control of nausea during the acute phase was achieved in 10 patients (41.2%) treated with O regimen alone, in 23 patients (92.0%) treated with OD regimen, and in 16 patients (64.0%) treated with ODA regimen (p < .001). In the delayed phase, 68% of patients who received the three-drug combination (ODA) and 56% of patients who received the two-drug combination (OD) obtained complete control of emesis, as opposed to 29% who were given ondansetron alone (p < .021). The incidences of headache, flushing, dry mouth, hiccups, and constipation were mild and tolerable and did not differ among the three groups.
Ondansetron was very effective in the prevention of nausea and vomiting during the acute phase after cisplatin administration. In treating delayed nausea and vomiting, although the results of three regimens were still disappointing, the combination of ondansetron plus dexamethasone or plus lorazepam provided superior results. Patients who received the lorazepam-containing regimen appeared more comfortable and less restless than those who were given other regimens.
比较单独使用昂丹司琼(O)、昂丹司琼加地塞米松(OD)、昂丹司琼加地塞米松加劳拉西泮(ODA)三种止吐方案在预防顺铂化疗所致呕吐中的有效性和副作用。
随机双盲试验。
本研究纳入了75例在第1天接受顺铂(60mg/m²)且在第2天至第6天接受氟尿嘧啶(1000mg/m²)治疗的患者。患者被随机分为三种治疗方案之一:O、OD或ODA。分配至O方案的患者在顺铂给药前15分钟静脉注射8mg昂丹司琼作为负荷剂量,然后以1mg/h持续静脉输注(24mg/天),持续48小时。OD方案包括上述给药方式的昂丹司琼加每12小时静脉注射10mg地塞米松,共3天。ODA方案是在OD方案基础上加每6小时口服0.5mg劳拉西泮,共3天。为确保盲法,O组患者每12小时静脉注射10ml安慰剂生理盐水,共3天,O组和OD组患者每6小时口服安慰剂片,共3天。
1例患者未接受分配的止吐方案,被排除在分析之外。在急性期,所有患者中85%的呕吐得到完全控制,三组之间无显著差异(p = 0.442)。单独使用O方案治疗的10例患者(41.2%)、使用OD方案治疗的23例患者(92.0%)、使用ODA方案治疗的16例患者(64.0%)在急性期实现了恶心的完全控制(p < 0.001)。在延迟期,接受三联药物组合(ODA)的患者中有68%、接受二联药物组合(OD)的患者中有56%的呕吐得到完全控制,而单独使用昂丹司琼的患者中这一比例为29%(p < 0.021)。头痛、潮红、口干、打嗝和便秘的发生率较轻且可耐受,三组之间无差异。
昂丹司琼在预防顺铂给药后急性期的恶心和呕吐方面非常有效。在治疗延迟性恶心和呕吐时,尽管三种方案的结果仍令人失望,但昂丹司琼加地塞米松或加劳拉西泮的联合方案效果更佳。接受含劳拉西泮方案的患者似乎比接受其他方案的患者更舒适、更少烦躁不安。