Becker W, Lynch S E, Lekholm U, Becker B E, Caffesse R, Donath K, Sanchez R
Department of Periodontics, University of Texas, Houston.
J Periodontol. 1992 Nov;63(11):929-40. doi: 10.1902/jop.1992.63.11.929.
The purpose of this study was to compare bone promotion around implants which were augmented with ePTFE membranes alone or in combination with cortical demineralized freeze-dried bone (DFDB) or the combination of platelet derived growth factor-BB (PDGF) and insulin like growth factor I (PDGF/IGF-I). Membranes were placed over titanium implants which had been inserted into fresh extraction sockets with large buccal dehiscences. Twenty-four implants were placed in 4 dogs. At 18 weeks clinical bone height measurements were taken, the animals were sacrificed, and all specimens retrieved for histologic evaluation. Clinically, a significant gain in bone levels was present in both the ePTFE membrane alone group (P < 0.005) and PTFE plus PDGF/IGF-I group (P < 0.01), but not in the PTFE plus DFDB group. Results from histometric measurements revealed an approximately 2-fold increase in the percentage of implant surface in contact with bone, area of bone adjacent to the implant surface, and in the total length of the implant surface in contact with bone in the dehiscence defects treated with ePTFE plus PDGF/IGF-I compared to the defects receiving ePTFE membranes alone (each P < 0.05). The response to the DFDB was highly variable and it did not significantly improve the efficacy of the PTFE membranes for any parameter measured. The distance from the outer surface of the new bone to the implant surface was statistically significant for ePTFE membranes alone and membranes plus PDGF/IGF-I. The results demonstrated that clinically, ePTFE membranes alone or ePTFE membranes with PDGF/IGF-I were equally effective in promoting bone growth around the implants. Histologic measurements demonstrated that sites treated with ePTFE membranes plus PDGF/IGF-I had the highest bone density compared with sites which received ePTFE membranes alone or with ePTFE membranes and DFDB. The results of this study question the use of DFDB and support the use of ePTFE membranes alone or with PDG-F-BB/IGF-I as potential methods of promoting bone formation around dental implants.
本研究的目的是比较仅用ePTFE膜或与皮质脱矿冻干骨(DFDB)联合使用,或血小板衍生生长因子-BB(PDGF)与胰岛素样生长因子I(PDGF/IGF-I)联合使用时,种植体周围的骨增量情况。将膜放置在已植入新鲜拔牙窝且存在大的颊侧骨缺损的钛种植体上。在4只犬中植入24枚种植体。在18周时进行临床骨高度测量,处死动物,并取出所有标本进行组织学评估。临床上,仅ePTFE膜组(P < 0.005)和PTFE加PDGF/IGF-I组(P < 0.01)的骨水平均有显著增加,但PTFE加DFDB组没有。组织计量学测量结果显示,与仅接受ePTFE膜治疗的骨缺损相比,用ePTFE加PDGF/IGF-I治疗的骨缺损中,种植体与骨接触的表面百分比、种植体表面相邻骨的面积以及种植体与骨接触的总长度均增加了约2倍(各P < 0.05)。对DFDB的反应高度可变,并且对于所测量的任何参数,它均未显著提高PTFE膜的疗效。仅ePTFE膜组以及膜加PDGF/IGF-I组中,新骨外表面到种植体表面的距离具有统计学意义。结果表明,临床上,仅ePTFE膜或ePTFE膜与PDGF/IGF-I在促进种植体周围骨生长方面同样有效。组织学测量表明,与仅接受ePTFE膜或接受ePTFE膜与DFDB治疗的部位相比,用ePTFE膜加PDGF/IGF-I治疗的部位骨密度最高。本研究结果对DFDB的使用提出质疑,并支持单独使用ePTFE膜或与PDG-F-BB/IGF-I联合使用作为促进牙种植体周围骨形成的潜在方法。