• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

吲哚洛尔与米那普明联合用药对比米那普明与安慰剂对抑郁症患者血浆催乳素和促肾上腺皮质激素的影响。

Effect of pindolol and milnacipran versus milnacipran and placebo on plasma prolactin and adrenocorticotrophic hormone in depressed subjects.

作者信息

Isaac Maria B, Isaac Michael T

机构信息

South London and Maudsley NHS Trust, Gresham Psychiatric Intensive Care Unit, Bethlem Royal Hospital, Monks Orchard Road, Beckenham, Kent BR3 3BX, UK.

出版信息

Hum Psychopharmacol. 2003 Oct;18(7):569-74. doi: 10.1002/hup.522.

DOI:10.1002/hup.522
PMID:14533141
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Evidence that pindolol accelerates the action of antidepressants has been contradictory, and it is not clear why. The present study analyses the relationship between plasma prolactin (PRL) and ACTH levels and changes in relation to a milnacipran and pindolol combination versus milnacipran plus placebo.

METHOD

Eighty depressed patients agreed to take part in a double-blind randomized trial of milnacipran plus pindolol or placebo. Fifty-eight of them agreed to also take measures of ACTH and PRL levels. ACTH and PRL plasma levels were estimated on days 0 and 42 of the 6-week study. Age, gender and time of blood collection were recorded for each individual. The Montgomery-Asberg depression rating scale (MADRS) was used to measure the response to treatment. The patients were grouped into those with higher versus lower basal ACTH levels using the median of the sample (25 ng/l).

RESULTS

There were statistical differences in MADRS scores between the treatment groups on day 42. There were correlations between PRL levels on days 0 and 42; age and PRL levels on day 0; time of the PRL sample and the PRL levels on day 0 and day 42; ACTH and PRL levels on day 42. Regression analysis of the 58 patients showed that on day 0, PRL levels were dependent on the ACTH plasma levels on day 0, the time of the collection of the blood sample and the age. On day 42, the PRL levels were dependent on the ACTH levels and the time of the blood collection but not on the age. Patients with lower baseline ACTH levels on day 0 displayed a better clinical outcome when taking the combination of milnacipran and pindolol as shown in the differences in MADRS on day 42. The same group of patients showed lower PRL levels on day 42.

CONCLUSIONS

ACTH plasma levels at baseline or screening may help to predict the response to antidepressant treatment.

摘要

目的

关于吲哚洛尔加速抗抑郁药作用的证据相互矛盾,原因尚不明确。本研究分析了血浆催乳素(PRL)和促肾上腺皮质激素(ACTH)水平之间的关系,以及与米那普明和吲哚洛尔联合用药与米那普明加安慰剂相比的变化情况。

方法

80名抑郁症患者同意参与米那普明加吲哚洛尔或安慰剂的双盲随机试验。其中58人还同意测量ACTH和PRL水平。在为期6周的研究的第0天和第42天估计ACTH和PRL血浆水平。记录每个个体的年龄、性别和采血时间。使用蒙哥马利-阿斯伯格抑郁评定量表(MADRS)来衡量治疗反应。根据样本中位数(25 ng/l)将患者分为基础ACTH水平较高和较低的两组。

结果

第42天时治疗组之间的MADRS评分存在统计学差异。第0天和第42天的PRL水平之间存在相关性;第0天的年龄和PRL水平之间存在相关性;PRL样本采集时间与第0天和第42天的PRL水平之间存在相关性;第42天的ACTH和PRL水平之间存在相关性。对58名患者的回归分析表明,在第0天,PRL水平取决于第0天的ACTH血浆水平、血样采集时间和年龄。在第42天,PRL水平取决于ACTH水平和采血时间,而不取决于年龄。如第42天MADRS的差异所示,第0天基础ACTH水平较低的患者在服用米那普明和吲哚洛尔联合用药时显示出更好的临床结果。同一组患者在第42天显示出较低的PRL水平。

结论

基线或筛查时的ACTH血浆水平可能有助于预测对抗抑郁治疗的反应。

相似文献

1
Effect of pindolol and milnacipran versus milnacipran and placebo on plasma prolactin and adrenocorticotrophic hormone in depressed subjects.吲哚洛尔与米那普明联合用药对比米那普明与安慰剂对抑郁症患者血浆催乳素和促肾上腺皮质激素的影响。
Hum Psychopharmacol. 2003 Oct;18(7):569-74. doi: 10.1002/hup.522.
2
Milnacipran and pindolol: a randomized trial of reduction of antidepressant latency.米那普明与吲哚洛尔:一项减少抗抑郁药起效延迟的随机试验
Hum Psychopharmacol. 2003 Dec;18(8):595-601. doi: 10.1002/hup.524.
3
Metyrapone as additive treatment in major depression: a double-blind and placebo-controlled trial.甲吡酮作为重度抑郁症的辅助治疗:一项双盲安慰剂对照试验。
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2004 Dec;61(12):1235-44. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.61.12.1235.
4
Gender differences in the clinical effects of fluvoxamine and milnacipran in Japanese major depressive patients.氟伏沙明和米那普明对日本重度抑郁症患者临床疗效的性别差异。
Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2007 Aug;61(4):421-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1819.2007.01679.x.
5
Comparison of efficacy and safety of milnacipran and fluoxetine in Korean patients with major depression.米那普明与氟西汀治疗韩国重度抑郁症患者的疗效及安全性比较。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2005 Sep;21(9):1369-75. doi: 10.1185/030079905X59166.
6
No predictors of antidepressant patient response to milnacipran were obtained using the three-factor structures of the Montgomery and Asberg Depression Rating Scale in Japanese patients with major depressive disorders.在患有重度抑郁症的日本患者中,使用蒙哥马利和阿斯伯格抑郁评定量表的三因素结构未获得抗抑郁药患者对米那普明反应的预测指标。
Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2008 Apr;62(2):197-202. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1819.2008.01755.x.
7
Hormonal responses to the 5-HT1A agonist buspirone in remitted endogenous depressive patients after long-term imipramine treatment.长期丙咪嗪治疗缓解后的内源性抑郁患者对 5-HT1A 激动剂丁螺环酮的激素反应。
Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2010 May;35(4):481-9. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2009.08.012. Epub 2009 Sep 16.
8
Rates of remission/euthymia with quetiapine monotherapy compared with placebo in patients with acute mania.在急性躁狂症患者中,喹硫平单药治疗与安慰剂相比的缓解/心境正常率。
J Affect Disord. 2007;100 Suppl 1:S45-53. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2007.02.006. Epub 2007 Mar 26.
9
Outcome in delusional depression comparing trimipramine monotherapy with a combination of amitriptyline and haloperidol--a double-blind multicenter trial.比较三甲丙咪嗪单一疗法与阿米替林和氟哌啶醇联合疗法治疗妄想性抑郁症的疗效——一项双盲多中心试验。
J Psychiatr Res. 2009 Apr;43(7):702-10. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2008.10.004. Epub 2008 Nov 26.
10
Relationships among pain, depressed mood, and global status in fibromyalgia patients: post hoc analyses of a randomized, placebo-controlled trial of milnacipran.纤维肌痛症患者疼痛、抑郁情绪与整体状况之间的关系:米那普仑随机、安慰剂对照试验的事后分析。
Psychosomatics. 2012 Jul-Aug;53(4):371-9. doi: 10.1016/j.psym.2012.02.005. Epub 2012 Jun 6.