Boyer Suzanne, Kapur Vishesh
Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, University of Washington, Sleep Disorders Center, Seattle, 98104, USA.
Curr Opin Pulm Med. 2003 Nov;9(6):465-70. doi: 10.1097/00063198-200311000-00003.
There is growing awareness of the significance of obstructive sleep apnea in the general population and in the medical community and, as a result, there is a growing demand for diagnosis and treatment. Attended, in-laboratory polysomnography is resource intensive and not readily available in some communities. Alternate diagnostic strategies have been proposed including the use of home sleep studies. Although these portable systems have been in use for many years, only in the past few years have a significant number of studies been performed to evaluate these systems in the home setting. The use of actigraphy and peripheral arterial tonometry for diagnostic purposes has also recently been investigated.
In the laboratory setting, measurements of sleep-disordered breathing with specific portable sleep systems correspond well with measurements provided by standard polysomnography. In the home setting, portable systems demonstrate several important limitations including lost or inadequate data collection, logistic concerns, and mildly reduced diagnostic accuracy. Data regarding the potential cost benefit of home studies is inconclusive.
Home polysomnography is a viable option for evaluating patients with moderate or high clinical suspicion for sleep-disordered breathing. However, patients with failed or equivocal home studies and those with negative studies but persistent symptoms should undergo standard polysomnography. Further investigations are needed to compare long-term outcomes in patients evaluated using portable devices versus standard polysomnography.
阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停在普通人群和医学界的重要性正日益受到关注,因此对其诊断和治疗的需求也在不断增加。在实验室进行的有医护人员在场的多导睡眠图检查资源消耗大,且在一些社区难以获得。已提出了替代诊断策略,包括使用家庭睡眠监测。尽管这些便携式系统已使用多年,但直到最近几年才有大量研究在家庭环境中评估这些系统。近期也对使用活动记录仪和外周动脉张力测定法进行诊断进行了研究。
在实验室环境中,特定便携式睡眠系统对睡眠呼吸障碍的测量结果与标准多导睡眠图提供的测量结果高度一致。在家庭环境中,便携式系统存在几个重要局限性,包括数据收集丢失或不充分、后勤问题以及诊断准确性略有降低。关于家庭监测潜在成本效益的数据尚无定论。
家庭多导睡眠图是评估临床怀疑为中度或高度睡眠呼吸障碍患者的可行选择。然而,家庭监测失败或结果不明确的患者以及家庭监测结果为阴性但症状持续的患者应接受标准多导睡眠图检查。需要进一步研究来比较使用便携式设备评估的患者与使用标准多导睡眠图检查的患者的长期结果。