Suppr超能文献

在家中进行睡眠研究是否合适?

Are sleep studies appropriately done in the home?

机构信息

Department of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota 55905, USA.

出版信息

Respir Care. 2010 Jan;55(1):66-75.

Abstract

For many years the greatest barrier to the diagnosis and treatment of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) was recognizing the disease. That obstacle is now fading as more physicians of all types are aware of the high prevalence of OSA and the consequences of untreated OSA. Sleep-laboratory polysomnography has long been considered the accepted standard for OSA diagnosis and has become a lucrative practice. This, unfortunately, has led to a concentration on diagnosis rather than on management of OSA. Although several brands of portable polysomnograph have been approved for home polysomnography, obstacles to reimbursement (primarily from government, but also from private payers) have prevented widespread home polysomnography. Over the last 2 decades many scientific studies have supported a strong correlation between the findings from home polysomnography and sleep-laboratory polysomnography. However, limited data are available from good outcomes-oriented studies, so controversy surrounds home polysomnography in the diagnosis of OSA. We review the evidence and debate whether sleep studies are appropriately done in the home.

摘要

多年来,阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)诊断和治疗的最大障碍是识别这种疾病。随着越来越多的各类医生意识到 OSA 的高患病率和未经治疗的 OSA 的后果,这一障碍正在逐渐消失。睡眠实验室多导睡眠图长期以来一直被认为是 OSA 诊断的公认标准,并已成为一项有利可图的实践。不幸的是,这导致了人们对 OSA 诊断的关注甚于对其管理的关注。尽管已有几种便携式多导睡眠图获得批准用于家庭多导睡眠图检查,但报销障碍(主要来自政府,但也来自私人支付者)阻碍了家庭多导睡眠图的广泛应用。在过去的 20 年中,许多科学研究都支持家庭多导睡眠图与睡眠实验室多导睡眠图之间存在很强的相关性。然而,来自以良好结果为导向的研究的数据有限,因此家庭多导睡眠图在 OSA 诊断中的应用存在争议。我们回顾了证据并就睡眠研究是否适合在家中进行进行了辩论。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验