Belenky A, Abarbanel Y, Cohen M, Yossepowitch O, Livne P M, Bachar G N
Department of Radiology, Rabin Medical Center, Beilinson Campus, Petah Tiqva, Israel.
Urology. 2003 Oct;62(4):647-50. doi: 10.1016/s0090-4295(03)00510-7.
To appraise detrusor blood flow by Doppler ultrasonography in men with suspected bladder outlet obstruction (BOO) to determine whether this imaging technique provides useful information for the assessment of BOO. Experimental studies have shown that BOO is associated with reduced blood flow to the detrusor.
Twenty-nine consecutive men with lower urinary tract symptoms were prospectively enrolled. A urodynamic pressure-flow study was performed by the urologist to determine BOO, and Doppler ultrasonography was subsequently performed by the radiologist. The physicians were unaware of the other's results. Scanning was performed on a filled and empty bladder. Arterial blood flow was measured at three distinct sites, the two lateral walls and the trigone, and the resistive index (RI) of each site was calculated (RI = (V(MAX) - V(MIN))/V(MAX)). For each patient, the arithmetic average of the three RIs was defined as the detrusor RI. The findings were compared between patients with and without evidence of BOO. A logistic regression model tested the predictive value of the RI.
According to the pressure-flow study results, 22 (75%) and 7 (25%) of the 29 patients were diagnosed as having or not having BOO, respectively. A statistically significant difference was found between the detrusor RI in the obstructed versus nonobstructed patients in both full (P <0.001) and empty (P <0.03) bladder states (0.79 versus 0.68 and 0.74 versus 0.66, respectively). Our logistic regression model predicted BOO with an overall accuracy of 86%, positive predictive value of 95%, and negative predictive value of 57%.
The RI of arterial blood flow in the detrusor measured by Doppler ultrasonography provides important predictive information for the presence of BOO. Additional studies are warranted to validate our results and explore the role of Doppler ultrasonography in the management paradigms of patients with suspected BOO.
通过多普勒超声评估疑似膀胱出口梗阻(BOO)男性患者的逼尿肌血流情况,以确定该成像技术是否能为BOO评估提供有用信息。实验研究表明,BOO与逼尿肌血流减少有关。
前瞻性纳入29例连续的下尿路症状男性患者。泌尿科医生进行尿动力学压力-流率研究以确定是否存在BOO,随后放射科医生进行多普勒超声检查。医生们对彼此的检查结果均不知情。分别在膀胱充盈和排空状态下进行扫描。在三个不同部位测量动脉血流,即两侧壁和三角区,并计算每个部位的阻力指数(RI)(RI =(V(MAX)-V(MIN))/V(MAX))。对于每位患者,将三个RI的算术平均值定义为逼尿肌RI。比较有和无BOO证据患者的检查结果。采用逻辑回归模型检验RI的预测价值。
根据压力-流率研究结果,29例患者中分别有22例(75%)和7例(25%)被诊断为存在或不存在BOO。在膀胱充盈(P <0.001)和排空(P <0.03)状态下,梗阻患者与非梗阻患者的逼尿肌RI均存在统计学显著差异(分别为0.79对0.68和0.74对0.66)。我们的逻辑回归模型预测BOO的总体准确率为86%,阳性预测值为95%,阴性预测值为57%。
通过多普勒超声测量的逼尿肌动脉血流RI可为BOO的存在提供重要的预测信息。有必要进行更多研究以验证我们的结果,并探索多普勒超声在疑似BOO患者管理模式中的作用。