• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Review of procedures for protecting human subjects in recent clinical studies of pesticides.

作者信息

Charnley Gail, Patterson Jacqueline

机构信息

HealthRisk Strategies, 826 A Street SE, Washington, DC 20003, USA.

出版信息

Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2003 Oct;38(2):210-23. doi: 10.1016/s0273-2300(03)00093-x.

DOI:10.1016/s0273-2300(03)00093-x
PMID:14550761
Abstract

Arguments have been made for and against the regulatory use of data from human subjects on both scientific and ethical grounds. One argument against the use of data from human clinical studies involving pesticides asserts that such data are obtained from studies that do not follow the Common Rule (40 CFR 26), which provides procedures for protecting human subjects in studies funded by federal agencies, including the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA). Although privately conducted studies using human subjects are not legally subject to or required to comply with the Common Rule, the protections of the Declaration of Helsinki and the International Conference on Harmonisation (ICH) Good Clinical Practice are commonly followed. We sought to answer the question of whether recent human clinical studies with insecticides performed according to Good Clinical Practice provided volunteers with the same protections as the Common Rule. All three sets of guidance have in common the intent to protect volunteer human subjects by providing standards for the conduct of studies in which they participate. This analysis compares the elements of the Common Rule with comparable elements from the Declaration of Helsinki and Good Clinical Practice to evaluate similarities and differences in procedural requirements. It then evaluates the documentation from 15 recent human studies of twelve insecticides conducted at four clinical laboratories in order to determine whether the conduct of those studies is consistent with the protections of the Common Rule. There were some cases for which we could not verify compliance with certain Common Rule elements; however, based on our evaluation it is apparent that the studies we reviewed were conducted in a manner substantially consistent with the fundamental protections of the Common Rule-voluntary participation, informed consent, and review by an ethical committee or institutional review board.

摘要

相似文献

1
Review of procedures for protecting human subjects in recent clinical studies of pesticides.
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2003 Oct;38(2):210-23. doi: 10.1016/s0273-2300(03)00093-x.
2
Human subject protection; foreign clinical studies not conducted under an investigational new drug application. Final rule.人体受试者保护;未依据新药临床试验申请开展的国外临床研究。最终规则。
Fed Regist. 2008 Apr 28;73(82):22800-16.
3
Protection for subjects in human research. Final rule.人类研究中受试者的保护。最终规则。
Fed Regist. 2006 Feb 6;71(24):6137-76.
4
Tobacco industry research and protection of human subjects: a case study of R. J. Reynolds.烟草行业的人体研究与受试者保护:以雷诺兹烟草公司为例
Nicotine Tob Res. 2007 Nov;9(11):1213-25. doi: 10.1080/14622200701648425.
5
Is the codification of vulnerability in international documents a sufficient mechanism of protection in the clinical research ethics context?在临床研究伦理背景下,国际文件中对脆弱性的编纂是否是一种充分的保护机制?
Med Law. 2011 Dec;30(4):497-515.
6
Research involving children: regulations, review boards and reform.涉及儿童的研究:法规、审查委员会与改革
J Health Care Law Policy. 2005;8(2):264-330.
7
New Developments in Human Subjects Protections: Proposed Updates to the Common Rule.人类受试者保护的新进展:《通用准则》的拟议更新
AMA J Ethics. 2015 Dec 1;17(12):1147-51. doi: 10.1001/journalofethics.2015.17.12.hlaw1-1512.
8
EPA's 2006 human-subjects rule for pesticide experiments.美国环境保护局2006年关于农药实验的人体实验规定。
Account Res. 2007 Oct-Dec;14(4):211-54. doi: 10.1080/08989620701670161.
9
More subject and less human: the pain-filled journey of human subjects protection ... and some differences in the United States and the European Union.更多受试验对象,更少人性:人类受试者保护的痛苦历程……以及美国和欧盟的一些差异。
Med Law Int. 2005;7(1):65-89. doi: 10.1177/096853320500700103.
10
Research involving human subjects: ethical and regulatory issues.涉及人类受试者的研究:伦理与监管问题
Handb Clin Neurol. 2013;118:289-99. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-444-53501-6.00024-X.

引用本文的文献

1
The ethics of human volunteer studies involving experimental exposure to pesticides: unanswered dilemmas.涉及实验性接触农药的人体志愿者研究的伦理学:未解决的困境。
Environ Health. 2010 Aug 18;9:50. doi: 10.1186/1476-069X-9-50.