• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

脑死亡的神经科医生及哈佛标准。

The neurologist and Harvard criteria for brain death.

作者信息

Wijdicks Eelco F M

机构信息

Department of Neurology and the Neurological-Neurosurgical Intensive Care Unit, Saint Marys Hospital, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.

出版信息

Neurology. 2003 Oct 14;61(7):970-6. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000086804.18169.8d.

DOI:10.1212/01.wnl.0000086804.18169.8d
PMID:14557571
Abstract

The Harvard ad hoc committee to examine the definition of brain death, chaired by anesthesiologist Beecher, published their report in 1968. Throughout the years, the committee has been a target of criticism. However, the workings of the ad hoc committee have not been carefully evaluated, and could provide insight into the role of the neurologists and their interaction with contemporaries. Review of the original files and interviews with three surviving members-Adams, Potter, and Murray-revealed 1) a major role and original contributions of the neurologists Schwab and Adams in defining criteria, and 2) a swift and decisive working committee that formulated a document aimed at simplicity and accuracy, and without special interest.

摘要

由麻醉学家比彻担任主席的哈佛特设委员会,负责审查脑死亡的定义,并于1968年发表了他们的报告。多年来,该委员会一直是批评的对象。然而,特设委员会的工作并未得到仔细评估,而这可能有助于深入了解神经科医生的作用以及他们与同时代人的互动。查阅原始档案并采访三位在世成员——亚当斯、波特和默里后发现:1)神经科医生施瓦布和亚当斯在定义标准方面发挥了主要作用并做出了原创性贡献;2)该工作委员会迅速果断,制定了一份旨在简洁准确且无特殊利益倾向的文件。

相似文献

1
The neurologist and Harvard criteria for brain death.脑死亡的神经科医生及哈佛标准。
Neurology. 2003 Oct 14;61(7):970-6. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000086804.18169.8d.
2
How Harvard Defined Irreversible Coma.哈佛对不可逆昏迷的定义。
Neurocrit Care. 2018 Aug;29(1):136-141. doi: 10.1007/s12028-018-0579-8.
3
Beecher Dépassé: Fifty Years of Determining Death, Legally.比彻过时了:五十年来,法律上确定死亡的标准。
Hastings Cent Rep. 2018 Nov;48 Suppl 4:S14-S18. doi: 10.1002/hast.945.
4
Deliberating Death in the Summer of 1968.1968年夏天对死亡的思考。
N Engl J Med. 2018 Aug 2;379(5):412-415. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1802952.
5
Brief review: history, concept and controversies in the neurological determination of death.简要回顾:神经学判定死亡的历史、概念及争议
Can J Anaesth. 2006 Jun;53(6):602-8. doi: 10.1007/BF03021852.
6
Defining brain death: motivations and future directions.
Int Anesthesiol Clin. 2007 Fall;45(4):121-33. doi: 10.1097/AIA.0b013e31812e567d.
7
Landmark article Aug 5, 1968: A definition of irreversible coma. Report of the Ad Hoc Committee of the Harvard Medical School to examine the definition of brain death.里程碑文章,1968年8月5日:不可逆昏迷的定义。哈佛医学院审查脑死亡定义特设委员会的报告。
JAMA. 1984 Aug 3;252(5):677-9.
8
Would a Reasonable Person Now Accept the 1968 Harvard Brain Death Report? A Short History of Brain Death.现在会有理智的人接受 1968 年哈佛脑死亡报告吗?脑死亡简史。
Hastings Cent Rep. 2018 Nov;48 Suppl 4:S6-S9. doi: 10.1002/hast.943.
9
[Told story (stories): brain death from the viewpoint of the actors].
Praxis (Bern 1994). 2004 Aug 11;93(33):1328-32. doi: 10.1024/0369-8394.93.33.1328.
10
CE: Brain Death: History, Updates, and Implications for Nurses.脑死亡:历史、更新及对护士的影响。
Am J Nurs. 2020 Mar;120(3):32-38. doi: 10.1097/01.NAJ.0000656332.62081.98.

引用本文的文献

1
What Is the Ideal Brain Criterion of Death? Nonclinical Considerations: The UDDA Revision Series.什么是理想的脑死亡标准?非临床考量:《统一死亡判定法案》修订系列
Neurology. 2023 Jul 11;101(2):86-87. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000207360.
2
The Korein-Pallis Feud and How It Shaped a Core Understanding of Brain Death.
Neurocrit Care. 2025 Feb;42(1):286-289. doi: 10.1007/s12028-022-01452-z. Epub 2022 Feb 10.
3
Whole-brain death and integration: realigning the ontological concept with clinical diagnostic tests.全脑死亡与整合:使本体论概念与临床诊断测试相一致。
Theor Med Bioeth. 2019 Oct;40(5):455-481. doi: 10.1007/s11017-019-09504-w.
4
Performing the Brain Death Examination and the Declaration of Pediatric Brain Death.进行小儿脑死亡检查及脑死亡宣告
J Pediatr Intensive Care. 2017 Dec;6(4):229-233. doi: 10.1055/s-0037-1604013. Epub 2017 Jun 27.
5
Critical synopsis and key questions in brain death determination.脑死亡判定中的关键概述与关键问题
Intensive Care Med. 2019 Mar;45(3):306-309. doi: 10.1007/s00134-019-05549-6. Epub 2019 Feb 6.
6
How Harvard Defined Irreversible Coma.哈佛对不可逆昏迷的定义。
Neurocrit Care. 2018 Aug;29(1):136-141. doi: 10.1007/s12028-018-0579-8.
7
Pope John Paul II and the neurological standard for the determination of death: A critical analysis of his address to the Transplantation Society.教皇约翰·保罗二世与判定死亡的神经学标准:对他在移植学会演讲的批判性分析
Linacre Q. 2017 May;84(2):155-186. doi: 10.1080/00243639.2017.1307502. Epub 2017 Jun 1.
8
Organ Donation : Intensive Care Issues in Managing Brain Dead.器官捐赠:脑死亡管理中的重症监护问题
Med J Armed Forces India. 2009 Apr;65(2):155-60. doi: 10.1016/S0377-1237(09)80132-9. Epub 2011 Jul 21.
9
Neuro-intensive treatment targeting intracranial hypertension improves outcome in severe bacterial meningitis: an intervention-control study.针对颅内高压的神经强化治疗可改善重症细菌性脑膜炎的预后:一项干预对照研究。
PLoS One. 2014 Mar 25;9(3):e91976. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0091976. eCollection 2014.
10
Is brain death diagnosis in newborns feasible?新生儿脑死亡诊断可行吗?
Hippokratia. 2012 Oct;16(4):308-11.