• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于人口统计学模型的西欧狼(犬属灰狼)保护与控制策略。

Conservation and control strategies for the wolf (Canis lupus) in western Europe based on demographic models.

作者信息

Chapron Guillaume, Legendre Stéphane, Ferrière Régis, Clobert Jean, Haight Robert G

机构信息

Laboratoire d'écologie, CNRS UMR 7625, Ecole normale supérieure, 46, rue d'Ulm, 75230 Paris, France.

出版信息

C R Biol. 2003 Jun;326(6):575-87. doi: 10.1016/s1631-0691(03)00148-3.

DOI:10.1016/s1631-0691(03)00148-3
PMID:14558477
Abstract

Securing the long-term acceptance of large carnivores such as the wolf (Canis lupus) in Europe and North America raises a difficult challenge to conservation biologists: planning removals to reduce depredations on livestock while ensuring population viability. We use stochastic-stage-structured population models to investigate wolf population dynamics and to assess alternative management strategies. Among the various management strategies advocated by agencies, zoning that involves eliminating wolves outside a restricted area should be designed with caution, because probabilities of extinction are extremely sensitive to the maximum number of packs that a zone can support and to slight changes in stage specific survival probabilities. In a zoned population, viability is enhanced more by decreasing mortality rates in all classes than by increasing wolf zone size. An alternative to zoning is adaptive management, where there is no limit on pack number but population control can be operated whenever some predefined demographic conditions are met. It turns out that an adaptive management strategy that removes a moderate percentage (10%) of the population following each year of more than 5% of total population growth would provide visible actions addressing public concerns while keeping extinction probability low.

摘要

在欧洲和北美,确保狼(Canis lupus)等大型食肉动物被长期接受,这给保护生物学家带来了一项艰巨挑战:既要规划捕杀行动以减少对家畜的捕食,又要确保种群的生存能力。我们使用随机阶段结构种群模型来研究狼的种群动态,并评估替代管理策略。在各机构倡导的各种管理策略中,涉及在限制区域外消灭狼的分区管理应谨慎设计,因为灭绝概率对一个区域所能支持的最大狼群数量以及特定阶段生存概率的微小变化极为敏感。在分区种群中,通过降低所有年龄段的死亡率来提高生存能力,比增加狼的分区面积更有效。分区管理的一种替代方法是适应性管理,即狼群数量没有限制,但只要满足一些预先定义的数据条件,就可以进行种群控制。事实证明,一种适应性管理策略是,在每年种群总增长超过5%之后,去除适度比例(10%)的种群,这样既能采取可见行动回应公众关切,又能保持低灭绝概率。

相似文献

1
Conservation and control strategies for the wolf (Canis lupus) in western Europe based on demographic models.基于人口统计学模型的西欧狼(犬属灰狼)保护与控制策略。
C R Biol. 2003 Jun;326(6):575-87. doi: 10.1016/s1631-0691(03)00148-3.
2
Conflict Misleads Large Carnivore Management and Conservation: Brown Bears and Wolves in Spain.冲突误导大型食肉动物的管理与保护:西班牙的棕熊与狼
PLoS One. 2016 Mar 14;11(3):e0151541. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0151541. eCollection 2016.
3
Elk migration patterns and human activity influence wolf habitat use in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem.麋鹿的迁徙模式和人类活动影响大黄石生态系统中狼的栖息地利用。
Ecol Appl. 2012 Dec;22(8):2293-307. doi: 10.1890/11-1829.1.
4
Developing metapopulation connectivity criteria from genetic and habitat data to recover the endangered Mexican wolf.从遗传和栖息地数据中制定复合种群连通性标准,以恢复濒危的墨西哥狼。
Conserv Biol. 2014 Feb;28(1):76-86. doi: 10.1111/cobi.12156. Epub 2013 Sep 20.
5
Wolves Recolonizing Islands: Genetic Consequences and Implications for Conservation and Management.狼在岛屿上重新定居:遗传后果及其对保护和管理的影响
PLoS One. 2016 Jul 6;11(7):e0158911. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0158911. eCollection 2016.
6
Wolf population genetics in Europe: a systematic review, meta-analysis and suggestions for conservation and management.欧洲的狼种群遗传学:系统综述、荟萃分析以及保护和管理建议。
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2017 Aug;92(3):1601-1629. doi: 10.1111/brv.12298. Epub 2016 Sep 28.
7
Effects of wolf mortality on livestock depredations.狼死亡率对牲畜捕食行为的影响。
PLoS One. 2014 Dec 3;9(12):e113505. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0113505. eCollection 2014.
8
Recolonizing wolves and mesopredator suppression of coyotes: impacts on pronghorn population dynamics.狼的重新引入与中型食肉动物对郊狼的抑制:对叉角羚种群动态的影响
Ecol Appl. 2008 Apr;18(3):599-612. doi: 10.1890/07-0308.1.
9
Deficiencies in Natura 2000 for protecting recovering large carnivores: A spotlight on the wolf Canis lupus in Poland.“自然2000”在保护大型食肉动物恢复方面的不足:以波兰的狼(犬属狼种)为例
PLoS One. 2017 Sep 5;12(9):e0184144. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0184144. eCollection 2017.
10
How to Choose? Comparing Different Methods to Count Wolf Packs in a Protected Area of the Northern Apennines.如何选择:比较在亚平宁山脉北部保护区中计算狼群数量的不同方法。
Genes (Basel). 2023 Apr 18;14(4):932. doi: 10.3390/genes14040932.

引用本文的文献

1
Trans-Boundary Edge Effects in the Western Carpathians: The Influence of Hunting on Large Carnivore Occupancy.西喀尔巴阡山脉的跨界边缘效应:狩猎对大型食肉动物栖息地占用的影响。
PLoS One. 2016 Dec 21;11(12):e0168292. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0168292. eCollection 2016.
2
Camera Traps on Wildlife Crossing Structures as a Tool in Gray Wolf (Canis lupus) Management - Five-Years Monitoring of Wolf Abundance Trends in Croatia.野生动物通道结构上的相机陷阱作为灰狼(Canis lupus)管理工具——克罗地亚灰狼数量趋势的五年监测
PLoS One. 2016 Jun 21;11(6):e0156748. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0156748. eCollection 2016.
3
Using Species Distribution Models to Predict Potential Landscape Restoration Effects on Puma Conservation.
利用物种分布模型预测潜在景观恢复对美洲狮保护的影响。
PLoS One. 2016 Jan 6;11(1):e0145232. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0145232. eCollection 2016.
4
The relative importance of direct and indirect effects of hunting mortality on the population dynamics of brown bears.狩猎死亡率对棕熊种群动态的直接和间接影响的相对重要性。
Proc Biol Sci. 2015 Jan 7;282(1798):20141840. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2014.1840.
5
Carnivora population dynamics are as slow and as fast as those of other mammals: implications for their conservation.肉食动物的种群动态与其他哺乳动物一样缓慢而迅速:对其保护的启示。
PLoS One. 2013 Aug 12;8(8):e70354. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0070354. eCollection 2013.
6
Wolf reintroduction to Scotland: public attitudes and consequences for red deer management.狼重新引入苏格兰:公众态度及对马鹿管理的影响
Proc Biol Sci. 2007 Apr 7;274(1612):995-1002. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2006.0369.