Dimick Justin B, Cowan John A, Stanley James C, Henke Peter K, Pronovost Peter J, Upchurch Gilbert R
Section of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Michigan Medical Center, 1500 E. Medical Center Drive, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
J Vasc Surg. 2003 Oct;38(4):739-44. doi: 10.1016/s0741-5214(03)00470-1.
This study was undertaken to determine the relative importance of surgeon specialty, hospital volume, and surgeon volume on outcome after abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair.
Data were reviewed for 3912 patients undergoing AAA repair in the Nationwide Inpatient Sample during 1997. In-hospital mortality was compared between high-volume hospitals and low-volume hospitals and between high-volume surgeons and low-volume surgeons. High-volume hospitals performed more than 35 AAA repairs per year, and high-volume surgeons performed more than 10 AAA repairs per year. Vascular, cardiac, and general surgery specialization was identified by analysis of other procedures performed by each surgeon.
Overall, AAA repair mortality was 4.2%, and was lower at high-volume hospitals (3.0%) than at low-volume hospitals (5.5%) (P <.001). Lowest mortality was associated with operations performed by vascular surgeons (2.2%) compared with cardiac surgeons (4.0%) and general surgeons (5.5%) (P <.001). Mortality rates were also lower for high-volume hospitals (2.5%) compared with low-volume hospitals (5.6%) (P <.001). In a risk-adjusted analysis, high-volume hospital, vascular surgery specialty, and high-volume surgeon were all independently associated with lower risk of in-hospital mortality. In this analysis, risk reduction was 30% for high-volume hospitals (95% confidence interval [CI], 2%-51%; P <.05) and 40% for surgery by a high-volume surgeon (95% CI, 12%-60%; P =.01). AAA repair by general surgeons compared with vascular surgeons was associated with 76% greater risk for death (95% CI, 10%-190%; P =.02). No significant difference in mortality was found between cardiac and vascular surgeons.
High surgeon volume and hospital volume of AAA repair were both associated with lower mortality compared with low-volume providers. Increased specialization in vascular surgery was associated with markedly decreased mortality independent of AAA repair volume. Health policy in support of selective referral for AAA repair should consider surgical specialization in addition to provider volume thresholds.
本研究旨在确定外科医生专业、医院手术量和外科医生手术量对腹主动脉瘤(AAA)修复术后结局的相对重要性。
回顾了1997年全国住院患者样本中3912例行AAA修复术患者的数据。比较了高手术量医院与低手术量医院之间以及高手术量外科医生与低手术量外科医生之间的院内死亡率。高手术量医院每年进行超过35例AAA修复术,高手术量外科医生每年进行超过10例AAA修复术。通过分析每位外科医生进行的其他手术来确定血管外科、心脏外科和普通外科专业。
总体而言,AAA修复术的死亡率为4.2%,高手术量医院(3.0%)的死亡率低于低手术量医院(5.5%)(P<.001)。与心脏外科医生(4.0%)和普通外科医生(5.5%)相比,血管外科医生进行的手术死亡率最低(2.2%)(P<.001)。高手术量医院的死亡率(2.5%)也低于低手术量医院(5.6%)(P<.001)。在风险调整分析中,高手术量医院、血管外科专业和高手术量外科医生均与较低的院内死亡风险独立相关。在该分析中,高手术量医院的死亡风险降低30%(95%置信区间[CI],2%-51%;P<.05),高手术量外科医生手术的死亡风险降低40%(95%CI,12%-60%;P=.01)。与血管外科医生相比,普通外科医生进行的AAA修复术死亡风险高76%(95%CI,10%-190%;P=.02)。心脏外科医生和血管外科医生之间的死亡率无显著差异。
与低手术量的医疗服务提供者相比,高手术量的外科医生和高手术量的医院进行AAA修复术的死亡率均较低。血管外科专业化程度的提高与死亡率的显著降低相关,且与AAA修复术的手术量无关。支持AAA修复术选择性转诊的卫生政策除了考虑医疗服务提供者的手术量阈值外,还应考虑手术专业化。