Suppr超能文献

定义影响开放式腹主动脉瘤修复结果的外科医生手术量类型。

Defining the type of surgeon volume that influences the outcomes for open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.

机构信息

Dallas Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Dallas, Tex., USA.

出版信息

J Vasc Surg. 2011 Dec;54(6):1599-604. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2011.05.103. Epub 2011 Oct 1.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Prior studies have reported improved clinical outcomes with higher surgeon volume, which is assumed to be a product of the surgeon's experience with the index operation. We hypothesized that composite surgeon volume is an important determinant of outcome. We tested this hypothesis by comparing the impact of operation-specific surgeon volume versus composite surgeon volume on surgical outcomes, using open abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair as the index operation.

METHODS

The Nationwide Inpatient Sample was analyzed to identify patients undergoing open AAA repairs for 2000 to 2008. Surgeons were stratified into deciles based on annual volume of open AAA repairs ("operation-specific volume") and overall volume of open vascular operations ("composite volume"). Composite volume was defined by the sum of several open vascular operations: carotid endarterectomy, aortobifemoral bypass, femoral-popliteal bypass, and femoral-tibial bypass. Multiple logistic regression analyses were used to examine the relationship between surgeon volume and in-hospital mortality for open AAA repair, adjusting for both patient and hospital characteristics.

RESULTS

Between 2000 and 2008, an estimated 111,533 (95% confidence interval [CI], 102,296-121,232) elective open AAA repairs were performed nationwide by 6,857 surgeons. The crude in-hospital mortality rate over the study period was 6.1% (95% CI, 5.6%-6.5%). The mean number of open AAA repairs performed annually was 2.4 operations per surgeon. The mean composite volume was 5.3 operations annually. As expected, in-hospital mortality for open AAA repair decreased with increasing volume of open AAA repairs performed by a surgeon. Mortality rates for the lowest and highest deciles of surgeon volume were 10.2% and 4.5%, respectively (P < .0001). A similar pattern was observed for composite surgeon volume, as the mortality rates for the lowest and highest deciles of composite volume were 9.8% and 4.8%, respectively (P < .0001). After adjusting for patient and hospital characteristics, increasing composite surgeon volume remained a significant predictor of lower in-hospital mortality for open AAA repair (odds ratio, 0.994; 95% CI, .992-.996; P < .0001), whereas increasing volume of AAA repairs per surgeon did not predict in-hospital deaths.

CONCLUSIONS

The current study suggests that composite surgeon volume-not operation-specific volume-is a key determinant of in-hospital mortality for open AAA repair. This finding needs to be considered for future credentialing of surgeons.

摘要

目的

先前的研究报告称,手术医生的手术量较高会改善临床结果,这被认为是医生进行索引手术经验的产物。我们假设综合手术医生的手术量是手术结果的一个重要决定因素。我们通过比较特定手术医生手术量与综合手术医生手术量对手术结果的影响来检验这一假设,以开放性腹主动脉瘤(AAA)修复为索引手术。

方法

分析了 2000 年至 2008 年全国住院患者样本,以确定接受开放性 AAA 修复的患者。根据每年开放性 AAA 修复的数量(“特定手术量”)和开放性血管手术的总数量(“综合数量”),将医生分为十分位数。综合量是通过几种开放性血管手术的总和来定义的:颈动脉内膜切除术、主动脉-股动脉旁路移植术、股-腘动脉旁路移植术和股-胫动脉旁路移植术。采用多变量逻辑回归分析,调整患者和医院特征后,检验医生手术量与开放性 AAA 修复住院死亡率之间的关系。

结果

在 2000 年至 2008 年期间,全国有 6857 名外科医生进行了估计为 111533 例(95%置信区间[CI],102296-121232)择期开放性 AAA 修复。研究期间的住院死亡率为 6.1%(95%CI,5.6%-6.5%)。外科医生每年进行的平均开放性 AAA 修复手术次数为 2.4 次。平均综合量为每年 5.3 次手术。如预期的那样,随着外科医生进行的开放性 AAA 修复手术量的增加,开放性 AAA 修复的住院死亡率下降。手术量最低和最高十分位数的死亡率分别为 10.2%和 4.5%(P <.0001)。复合手术医生手术量也出现了类似的模式,最低和最高十分位数的死亡率分别为 9.8%和 4.8%(P <.0001)。调整患者和医院特征后,复合手术医生手术量的增加仍然是开放性 AAA 修复住院死亡率的显著预测因素(比值比,0.994;95%CI,0.992-0.996;P <.0001),而外科医生进行的 AAA 修复手术量的增加并不能预测住院死亡。

结论

本研究表明,综合手术医生的手术量而不是特定手术医生的手术量是开放性 AAA 修复住院死亡率的关键决定因素。这一发现需要在未来对外科医生的认证中考虑。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验