• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[波兰法医精神病学的现状与展望]

[Current state and perspectives of forensic psychiatry in Poland].

作者信息

Gierowski Józef Krzysztof

机构信息

Zakładu Psychologii Lekarskiej Katedry Psychiatrii CM UJ, Instytutu Ekspertyz Sadowych w Krakowie.

出版信息

Psychiatr Pol. 2003 Jul-Aug;37(4):577-90.

PMID:14560488
Abstract

The paper is an attempt to describe the current state of affairs and perspectives in Polish forensic psychiatry in relation to the EU rules and standards on dealing with psychiatric patients who break the law. Basic dilemmas and rules of forensic psychiatry are presented which allow for the formulation of a specific meta-model which in turn will enable further reforms and improvement of Polish forensic psychiatry. The author also analyses new opinion formulation rules in accordance with the criminal justica act of 1997. New legal regulations introduced solutions which improved the earlier legal regulations. This includes the role of the psychologist together with the psychiatrist, when deciding on the person's accountableness. Limiting detention use only in the cases of non-accountable offenders is an unfavourable action which is against European standards and makes it difficult for many psychiatrically ill offenders to obtain therapeutic help or adequate rehabilitation.

摘要

本文试图描述波兰法医精神病学的现状及前景,以及其与欧盟处理违法精神病患者的规则和标准的关系。文中介绍了法医精神病学的基本困境和规则,据此形成了一个特定的元模型,这将有助于波兰法医精神病学的进一步改革和完善。作者还根据1997年的刑事司法法案分析了新的意见形成规则。新的法律法规提出了改进先前法规的解决方案。这包括心理学家和精神科医生在判定一个人的责任能力时所起的作用。仅在无责任能力罪犯的情况下限制使用拘留是一项不利举措,它有悖于欧洲标准,使许多患有精神疾病的罪犯难以获得治疗帮助或充分的康复。

相似文献

1
[Current state and perspectives of forensic psychiatry in Poland].[波兰法医精神病学的现状与展望]
Psychiatr Pol. 2003 Jul-Aug;37(4):577-90.
2
[False forensic expertise--analysis of occurrences].[虚假法医鉴定——事件分析]
Psychiatr Pol. 2004 May-Jun;38(3):385-94.
3
[Complex expertise on the psychiatric health of a criminal].[关于罪犯精神健康的复杂专业知识]
Psychiatr Pol. 2006 Jan-Feb;40(1):5-17.
4
[Mental state and the criminal responsibility--legal regulations and medical criteria in Poland and other countries].[精神状态与刑事责任——波兰及其他国家的法律法规与医学标准]
Arch Med Sadowej Kryminol. 2009 Oct-Dec;59(4):309-19.
5
Implementation of the European Psychiatric Association (EPA) guidance on forensic psychiatry in Poland. Current state and required measures.在波兰实施欧洲精神病学协会(EPA)关于法医精神病学的指南。现状和所需措施。
Psychiatr Pol. 2020 Jun 30;54(3):553-570. doi: 10.12740/PP/109123.
6
[On the relationship between psychiatry and criminal law from a legal standpoint].[从法律角度看精神病学与刑法的关系]
Nervenarzt. 2005 Nov;76(11):1382-8. doi: 10.1007/s00115-005-2002-x.
7
[New penal law from the point of forensic psychiatry and psychology].[从法医精神病学和心理学角度看新刑法]
Psychiatr Pol. 1998 Jul-Aug;32(4):383-96.
8
Public evaluations of unrepresented defendants.对无代理被告的公众评价。
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 1995;23(1):93-103.
9
Ethical issues in forensic psychiatric research on mentally disordered offenders.论精神障碍罪犯法医精神病学研究中的伦理问题。
Bioethics. 2010 Jan;24(1):35-44. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8519.2009.01773.x.
10
Forensic psychiatry in Singapore.新加坡法医精神病学。
Asia Pac Psychiatry. 2013 Dec;5(4):344-51. doi: 10.1111/appy.12033. Epub 2013 Feb 25.