Suppr超能文献

[一组精神分裂症患者主观与客观生活质量的比较]

[Comparison of subjective and objective quality of life in a group of schizophrenic patients].

作者信息

Czernikiewicz Andrzej, Górecka Joanna

机构信息

Kliniki Psychiatrii AM w Białymstoku.

出版信息

Psychiatr Pol. 2003 Jul-Aug;37(4):669-81.

Abstract

AIM

The aim of this study is a comparison of subjective and objective quality of life in schizophrenic patients.

METHODS

The research was carried out on 120 in- and out-patients (from 19 to 65 years) who fulfilled ICD-10 and DSM-IV criteria for schizophrenia. The quality of life was assessed by means of two instruments: Quality of Life Scale (QLS, Heinrichs et al. 1984), Self-Report Quality of Life Measure for People with Schizophrenia (SQLS, Wilkinson et al. 2000). The basic statistical methods used were: correlation analysis between measurable variables with Pearson's index (P), t-Student test, analysis of variance, factor analysis.

RESULTS

In the investigated group there is no correlation between subjective and objective quality of life. Sex does not influence a correlation between these variables. Subjective and objective quality of life correlate with each other only in out-patients' group (P = -0.386). The factor analysis of SQLS distinguished 7 factors: mood; everyday activities, side effects connected with movement; side effects- others; support; interpersonal contacts; others; this division differs completely from a division on subscales. The factor analysis of QLS distinguished 3 factors: intrapsychic functioning; social functioning; functioning in roles; this division is similar to a division on subscales.

CONCLUSIONS

It seems that in the schizophrenic patients' group using subjective and objective ways to assess the quality of life determines a difference of the obtained results. Only the subjective measurement fulfills the assumption of quality of life definition, that is why the usefulness of QLS in assessing quality of life is rather restricted.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较精神分裂症患者的主观生活质量和客观生活质量。

方法

对120名符合ICD - 10和DSM - IV精神分裂症标准的住院和门诊患者(年龄在19至65岁之间)进行了研究。生活质量通过两种工具进行评估:生活质量量表(QLS,海因里希斯等人,1984年),精神分裂症患者生活质量自我报告量表(SQLS,威尔金森等人,2000年)。所使用的基本统计方法有:用皮尔逊指数(P)对可测量变量进行相关分析、t检验、方差分析、因子分析。

结果

在被调查群体中,主观生活质量和客观生活质量之间没有相关性。性别不影响这些变量之间的相关性。主观生活质量和客观生活质量仅在门诊患者组中相互关联(P = -0.386)。SQLS的因子分析区分出7个因子:情绪;日常活动、与运动相关的副作用;其他副作用;支持;人际接触;其他;这种划分与子量表的划分完全不同。QLS的因子分析区分出3个因子:心理内部功能;社会功能;角色功能;这种划分与子量表的划分相似。

结论

在精神分裂症患者群体中,使用主观和客观方法评估生活质量似乎会导致所得结果存在差异。只有主观测量符合生活质量定义的假设,这就是为什么QLS在评估生活质量方面的实用性相当有限。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验