Kaiser W, Priebe S, Hoffmann K, Isermann M
Abteilung für Rehabilitation und Allgemeine Psychiatrie, Krankenhaus Spandau, Berlin.
Nervenarzt. 1996 Jul;67(7):572-82.
The main results of quality of life research in sociology and social psychology and the findings of psychiatric studies on subjective quality of life are summarized. The present study examined subjective quality of life in patients with chronic schizophrenia in different treatment settings (n = 318/ICD 10:F20). The satisfaction scales of the instrument used (Berliner Lebensqualitätsprofil) are shown to have adequate consistency coefficients. Psychopathological variables accounted for more variance than demographic and illness-related characteristics and features of objective quality of life. Negative schizophrenic symptoms were not of particular concern, and anxiety/depression scores did not interact with satisfaction ratings in different settings. Two of nine domains (living situation and mental health) and the total scores showed significant differences between patients in different settings. The degree of contrast between in- and out-patients seemed to be influenced by the current length of stay of the in-patients. In addition to cross-sectional studies, there is a need for further examination of differences in subjective quality of life and in treatment effects in longitudinal studies, which should make use of panel designs.
总结了社会学和社会心理学中生活质量研究的主要成果以及精神病学关于主观生活质量研究的结果。本研究调查了处于不同治疗环境下的慢性精神分裂症患者(n = 318/国际疾病分类第10版:F20)的主观生活质量。所使用工具(《柏林生活质量量表》)的满意度量表显示具有足够的一致性系数。心理病理学变量比人口统计学、与疾病相关的特征以及客观生活质量特征解释了更多的方差。阴性精神分裂症症状并非特别令人关注,并且焦虑/抑郁评分在不同环境下与满意度评级没有相互作用。九个领域中的两个(生活状况和心理健康)以及总分在不同环境下的患者之间显示出显著差异。住院患者和门诊患者之间的对比程度似乎受住院患者当前住院时长的影响。除了横断面研究外,还需要在纵向研究中进一步考察主观生活质量差异和治疗效果差异,纵向研究应采用面板设计。