Musch Jochen
Department of Psychology, Lehrstuhl Psychologie III, Schloss-Ehrenhof Ost, University of Mannheim, Germany.
Memory. 2003 Jul-Sep;11(4-5):473-89. doi: 10.1080/09658210244000540.
Ten personality correlates of hindsight bias were tested in a study with 75 participants answering almanac-type knowledge questions. Participants showed hindsight bias when hindsight estimates were compared to foresight estimates (memory condition), when hindsight estimates were compared to foresight estimates of other participants (BS = between-subjects hypothetical condition), and when hindsight estimates were compared to foresight estimates in response to equally difficult control items (WS = within-subject hypothetical condition). The magnitude of hindsight bias in both hypothetical conditions was positively associated with the participant's field dependence and his or her tendency for favourable self-presentation (as measured by social desirability and impression management). Between-subjects hypothetical hindsight was associated with the participant's conscientiousness and need for predictability and control (as measured by a rigidity scale). In a multiple regression analysis, 39% of the variance in BS hypothetical hindsight, 24% of the variance in WS hypothetical hindsight, but no significant proportion of the variance in memory hindsight could be accounted for by personality measures. It is concluded that individual differences in hindsight bias exist and must be taken into account in a complete model of the effect.
在一项有75名参与者回答年鉴类知识问题的研究中,对后见之明偏差的十个个性相关因素进行了测试。当将后见之明估计与先见之明估计进行比较时(记忆条件),当将后见之明估计与其他参与者的先见之明估计进行比较时(BS = 组间假设条件),以及当将后见之明估计与针对同等难度控制项目的先见之明估计进行比较时(WS = 组内假设条件),参与者表现出后见之明偏差。在两种假设条件下,后见之明偏差的程度都与参与者的场依存性及其积极自我呈现的倾向呈正相关(通过社会赞许性和印象管理来衡量)。组间假设性后见之明与参与者的尽责性以及对可预测性和控制的需求相关(通过一个僵化量表来衡量)。在多元回归分析中,个性测量可以解释组间假设性后见之明中39%的方差变异、组内假设性后见之明中24%的方差变异,但无法解释记忆性后见之明中任何显著比例的方差变异。研究得出结论,后见之明偏差存在个体差异,在该效应的完整模型中必须予以考虑。