• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在患有双重诊断的成年人中建立对不可靠强化物的偏好。

Establishing preference for unreliable reinforcement in adults with dual diagnoses.

作者信息

Rehfeldt Ruth Anne, Randich Lisette

机构信息

Rehabilitation Institute, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale 62901-4609, USA.

出版信息

Psychol Rep. 2003 Aug;93(1):161-74. doi: 10.2466/pr0.2003.93.1.161.

DOI:10.2466/pr0.2003.93.1.161
PMID:14563045
Abstract

We evaluated the choice responding of three adults dually diagnosed with developmental and psychiatric disabilities using concurrent schedules of reinforcement. Specifically, participants were given a choice between a response option resulting in reliable reinforcement and a response option resulting in unreliable reinforcement. Our primary purpose was to shift preference from reliable to unreliable reinforcement via the systematic presentation of stimuli during delay intervals. A second purpose was to evaluate the effectiveness of intervening stimuli in shifting preference at differing delay-to-reinforcement intervals. Preference for unreliable reinforcement was first examined in the absence of stimulus presentations during delays, at three different delay values. Next, we aimed to establish preference for unreliable reinforcement by presenting pictures of reinforcers during delays preceding unreliable reinforcement. Preference was again examined at three different delay values. In the absence of stimulus presentations during delays, participants were shown to prefer reliable reinforcement, particularly at the longer delay value. When stimuli were presented during the delays, two of the three participants preferred unreliable reinforcement, particularly the longer the delay value. These results suggest that the presentation of intervening stimuli during delays may help facilitate tolerance for unreliable reinforcement.

摘要

我们使用并发强化程序评估了三名同时患有发育障碍和精神疾病的成年人的选择反应。具体而言,参与者要在一个能带来可靠强化的反应选项和一个带来不可靠强化的反应选项之间做出选择。我们的主要目的是通过在延迟间隔期间系统呈现刺激,将偏好从可靠强化转向不可靠强化。第二个目的是评估干预刺激在不同强化延迟间隔下改变偏好的有效性。首先,在延迟期间不呈现刺激的情况下,在三个不同的延迟值下,研究对不可靠强化的偏好。接下来,我们旨在通过在不可靠强化之前的延迟期间呈现强化物图片来建立对不可靠强化的偏好。再次在三个不同的延迟值下检查偏好。在延迟期间不呈现刺激时,可以看出参与者更喜欢可靠强化,尤其是在较长延迟值时。当在延迟期间呈现刺激时,三名参与者中有两名更喜欢不可靠强化,尤其是延迟值越长。这些结果表明,在延迟期间呈现干预刺激可能有助于促进对不可靠强化的耐受性。

相似文献

1
Establishing preference for unreliable reinforcement in adults with dual diagnoses.在患有双重诊断的成年人中建立对不可靠强化物的偏好。
Psychol Rep. 2003 Aug;93(1):161-74. doi: 10.2466/pr0.2003.93.1.161.
2
Preference for unreliable reinforcement in children with mental retardation: the role of conditioned reinforcement.智力发育迟缓儿童对不可靠强化物的偏好:条件强化的作用。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2000 Winter;33(4):533-44. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2000.33-533.
3
On the relative reinforcing effects of choice and differential consequences.关于选择和差别性后果的相对强化作用。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1997 Fall;30(3):423-38. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1997.30-423.
4
The effects of pairing non-preferred staff with preferred stimuli on increasing the reinforcing value of non-preferred staff attention.将非偏好性工作人员与偏好性刺激配对对提高非偏好性工作人员关注的强化价值的影响。
Res Dev Disabil. 2014 Apr;35(4):849-60. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2014.01.014. Epub 2014 Feb 5.
5
Preference reversal between impulsive and self-control choice.冲动与自控选择之间的偏好逆转。
J Exp Anal Behav. 2013 May;99(3):260-76. doi: 10.1002/jeab.23. Epub 2013 Feb 25.
6
An evaluation of a stimulus preference assessment of auditory stimuli for adolescents with developmental disabilities.对发育障碍青少年听觉刺激的刺激偏好评估
Res Dev Disabil. 2008 Jan-Feb;29(1):11-20. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2006.09.003. Epub 2006 Nov 9.
7
Effects of reinforcement choice on task responding in individuals with developmental disabilities.强化物选择对发育障碍个体任务反应的影响。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1997 Fall;30(3):411-22. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1997.30-411.
8
Choice between reliable and unreliable reinforcement alternatives revisited: Preference for unreliable reinforcement.重新审视可靠和不可靠强化物选择之间的关系:对不可靠强化物的偏好。
J Exp Anal Behav. 1994 Nov;62(3):353-66. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1994.62-353.
9
Using a choice assessment to predict reinforcer effectiveness.使用选择评估来预测强化物的有效性。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1996 Spring;29(1):1-9. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1996.29-1.
10
Relative versus absolute reinforcement effects: implications for preference assessments.相对与绝对强化效应:对偏好评估的影响
J Appl Behav Anal. 1999 Winter;32(4):479-93. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1999.32-479.