• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对发育障碍青少年听觉刺激的刺激偏好评估

An evaluation of a stimulus preference assessment of auditory stimuli for adolescents with developmental disabilities.

作者信息

Horrocks Erin, Higbee Thomas S

机构信息

Utah State University, Logan, UT 84322-2865, USA.

出版信息

Res Dev Disabil. 2008 Jan-Feb;29(1):11-20. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2006.09.003. Epub 2006 Nov 9.

DOI:10.1016/j.ridd.2006.09.003
PMID:17097267
Abstract

Previous researchers have used stimulus preference assessment (SPA) methods to identify salient reinforcers for individuals with developmental disabilities including tangible, leisure, edible and olfactory stimuli. In the present study, SPA procedures were used to identify potential auditory reinforcers and determine the reinforcement value of preferred and non-preferred auditory stimuli. The results from this study suggest that the paired stimulus procedure utilized was effective in identifying preferred and non-preferred auditory stimuli, as the contingent application of the identified auditory stimuli produced higher rates of correct responding than did non-preferred auditory stimuli for all participants.

摘要

先前的研究人员已经使用刺激偏好评估(SPA)方法来为发育障碍个体确定显著的强化物,包括有形的、休闲的、可食用的和嗅觉刺激。在本研究中,SPA程序被用于识别潜在的听觉强化物,并确定偏好和非偏好听觉刺激的强化价值。本研究的结果表明,所采用的配对刺激程序在识别偏好和非偏好听觉刺激方面是有效的,因为对于所有参与者而言,所识别出的听觉刺激的偶然应用比非偏好听觉刺激产生了更高的正确反应率。

相似文献

1
An evaluation of a stimulus preference assessment of auditory stimuli for adolescents with developmental disabilities.对发育障碍青少年听觉刺激的刺激偏好评估
Res Dev Disabil. 2008 Jan-Feb;29(1):11-20. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2006.09.003. Epub 2006 Nov 9.
2
Evaluation of a brief stimulus preference assessment.一项简短刺激偏好评估的评价
J Appl Behav Anal. 1998 Winter;31(4):605-20. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1998.31-605.
3
An evaluation of the use of eye gaze to measure preference of individuals with severe physical and developmental disabilities.一项关于使用目光注视来测量重度身体和发育残疾个体偏好的评估。
Dev Neurorehabil. 2010;13(4):266-75. doi: 10.3109/17518421003705706.
4
Comparison of verbal preference assessments in the presence and absence of the actual stimuli.实际刺激存在与不存在时言语偏好评估的比较。
Res Dev Disabil. 2006 Nov-Dec;27(6):645-56. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2005.08.001. Epub 2005 Nov 2.
5
Comparing preference assessments: selection- versus duration-based preference assessment procedures.比较偏好评估:基于选择与基于持续时间的偏好评估程序
Res Dev Disabil. 2009 Sep-Oct;30(5):1068-77. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2009.02.010. Epub 2009 Mar 26.
6
Evaluating the predictive validity of a single stimulus engagement preference assessment.评估单一刺激参与偏好评估的预测效度。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2001 Winter;34(4):475-85. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2001.34-475.
7
Preference assessment procedures for individuals with developmental disabilities.发育障碍个体的偏好评估程序。
Behav Modif. 2004 Sep;28(5):668-77. doi: 10.1177/0145445503259836.
8
Effects of choice of stimuli as reinforcement for task responding in reinforcement for task responding in preschoolers with and without developmental disabilities.在有和没有发育障碍的学龄前儿童中,选择刺激作为任务反应强化物对任务反应强化的影响。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2000 Spring;33(1):93-6. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2000.33-93.
9
Manipulating the behavior-altering effect of the motivating operation: examination of the influence on challenging behavior during leisure activities.操控动机性操作对行为的改变作用:考察其对休闲活动中问题行为的影响。
Res Dev Disabil. 2008 Jul-Aug;29(4):333-40. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2007.06.004. Epub 2007 Jul 16.
10
Reinforcer assessment for children with developmental disabilities and visual impairments.发育障碍和视力障碍儿童的强化物评估
J Appl Behav Anal. 1995 Summer;28(2):219-24. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1995.28-219.

引用本文的文献

1
The utility of assessing musical preference before implementation of noncontingent music to reduce vocal stereotypy.在实施非关联音乐以减少刻板发声之前,评估音乐偏好的效用。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2012 Winter;45(4):845-51. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2012.45-845.