Suppr超能文献

HIV感染高危人群中的替代HIV检测方法。

Alternative HIV testing methods among populations at high risk for HIV infection.

作者信息

Greensides Dawn R, Berkelman Ruth, Lansky Amy, Sullivan Patrick S

机构信息

MPH Program, Emory University, and Division of HIV/AIDS Prevention-Surveillance and Epidemiology, National Center for HIV, STD, and TB Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA 30333, USA.

出版信息

Public Health Rep. 2003 Nov-Dec;118(6):531-9. doi: 10.1093/phr/118.6.531.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to determine the levels of awareness and use of alternative HIV tests (home collection kit, oral mucosal transudate collection kit, and rapid tests) among people at high risk for HIV infection.

METHODS

Data were collected as part of an anonymous, cross-sectional interview study--the HIV Testing Survey (HITS)--conducted in seven states from September 2000 to February 2001. Three high-risk populations were recruited: men who have sex with men, injection drug users, and high-risk heterosexuals. Respondents were asked about their awareness and use of alternative HIV tests.

RESULTS

The overall awareness and use of the alternative tests was limited: 54% of respondents were aware of the home collection kit, 42% were aware of the oral mucosal transudate collection kit test, and 13% were aware of rapid tests. Among those aware of alternative tests, self-reported use of the tests was also low. The most common reasons given for not using alternative HIV tests were: preference for the standard test; concern that the results could be less accurate; and that alternative tests were not offered.

CONCLUSIONS

The low levels of awareness and use of alternative HIV tests suggest that the potential for promoting testing among individuals at high risk for HIV by encouraging use of alternative HIV tests has not been fully realized. Alternative tests should be made more broadly available and should be accompanied by education about these tests for physicians and people at risk. Educational efforts should be evaluated to determine if promoting alternative HIV tests increases the numbers of people at risk for HIV who are tested.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在确定艾滋病毒感染高危人群对替代艾滋病毒检测方法(家庭采集试剂盒、口腔黏膜渗出液采集试剂盒和快速检测)的知晓程度和使用情况。

方法

数据收集是2000年9月至2001年2月在七个州进行的一项匿名横断面访谈研究——艾滋病毒检测调查(HITS)的一部分。招募了三类高危人群:男男性行为者、注射吸毒者和高危异性恋者。询问了受访者对替代艾滋病毒检测方法的知晓程度和使用情况。

结果

对替代检测方法的总体知晓率和使用率有限:54%的受访者知晓家庭采集试剂盒,42%的受访者知晓口腔黏膜渗出液采集试剂盒检测,13%的受访者知晓快速检测。在知晓替代检测方法的人群中,自我报告的检测使用率也较低。不使用替代艾滋病毒检测方法的最常见原因是:偏爱标准检测;担心结果可能不太准确;以及未提供替代检测。

结论

对替代艾滋病毒检测方法的低知晓率和低使用率表明,通过鼓励使用替代艾滋病毒检测方法来促进艾滋病毒高危个体检测的潜力尚未得到充分发挥。应更广泛地提供替代检测方法,并应同时为医生和高危人群提供有关这些检测方法的教育。应评估教育工作,以确定推广替代艾滋病毒检测方法是否能增加接受检测的艾滋病毒高危人群数量。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验