Suppr超能文献

对比M型功率多普勒超声在检测右向左分流中的应用:下颌下颈内动脉记录的效用

Contrast M-mode power Doppler ultrasound in the detection of right-to-left shunts: utility of submandibular internal carotid artery recording.

作者信息

Topçuoglu M A, Palacios I F, Buonanno F S

机构信息

Department of Neurology, Stroke Service, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.

出版信息

J Neuroimaging. 2003 Oct;13(4):315-23.

Abstract

Cardiac right-to-left shunts (RLSs) can be detected by echocardiography and transcranial Doppler ultrasound (TCD). In patients without adequate transtemporal bone windows, results may be obtained by insonating extracranial arteries; however, the sensitivity and practicality of this approach is unknown. In 34 patients evaluated with echocardiography for RLSs, 73 studies were performed with unilateral, simultaneous contrast TCD (cTCD) of the middle cerebral artery (MCA) and anterior cerebral artery (ACA) and submandibular power M-mode Doppler (PMD) ultrasound of the extracranial internal carotid artery (ecICA). The number of microbubble (MB) signals and their times of first appearance were determined. RLS volume was graded on 6 levels (I = trace, II = small, III = medium, IVa = large, IVb = shower, IVc = curtain) and compared between MCA and ecICA recordings. In 2 of 24 cTCD studies in 15 patients without evidence of RLSs on single-gated MCA monitoring, low-volume RLSs (grades I and II) were detected via ecICA insonation; in both, MB signatures were tracked in the ecICA, passing into the ipsilateral ACA. In 40 of 49 studies (26 patients) in which RLSs were demonstrated with single-gated MCA monitoring, more MBs were detected in the ecICA than the MCA, with either single-gated or M-mode images, with increases of 76.9% and 66.1%, respectively (P = .027). Compared to single-gated studies, M-mode technology detected nonsignificant increases in MB number in both the MCA and the ecICA (by 20.2% and 14.0%, respectively). Contrast PMD with cervical ICA recording is at least as sensitive and specific as the traditional MCA method in detecting RLSs; furthermore, this method seems to be more sensitive for low-volume RLSs (grades I-III) because of air MB decay (9.2%) and entry into the ipsilateral ACA (34.2%). This is in concordance with the increase of detected RLS grades observed in 32.7% of patients with echocardiography-documented RLSs. The authors therefore suggest the incorporation of ecICA PMD not only in patients with poor ultrasonic bone windows but also in every patient being evaluated for suspected RLSs.

摘要

心脏右向左分流(RLS)可通过超声心动图和经颅多普勒超声(TCD)检测。对于没有足够颞骨透声窗的患者,可通过探测颅外动脉获得结果;然而,这种方法的敏感性和实用性尚不清楚。在34例接受超声心动图评估RLS的患者中,对大脑中动脉(MCA)和大脑前动脉(ACA)进行单侧同步对比TCD(cTCD),并对颅外颈内动脉(ecICA)进行下颌下功率M型多普勒(PMD)超声检查,共进行了73项研究。确定微泡(MB)信号的数量及其首次出现的时间。RLS量分为6级(I = 微量,II = 少量,III = 中等量,IVa = 大量,IVb = 簇状,IVc = 帘状),并比较MCA和ecICA记录结果。在15例单门控MCA监测未发现RLS证据的患者的24项cTCD研究中,有2项通过ecICA探测发现了低量RLS(I级和II级);在这两项研究中,MB信号在ecICA中被追踪到同侧ACA。在49项研究(26例患者)中的40项中,单门控MCA监测显示存在RLS,无论是单门控还是M型图像,ecICA中检测到的MB均多于MCA,分别增加了76.9%和66.1%(P = 0.027)。与单门控研究相比,M型技术检测到MCA和ecICA中的MB数量均无显著增加(分别增加20.2%和14.0%)。对比PMD联合颈内动脉记录在检测RLS方面至少与传统MCA方法一样敏感和特异;此外,由于空气微泡衰减(9.2%)和进入同侧ACA(34.2%),这种方法似乎对低量RLS(I - III级)更敏感。这与32.7%经超声心动图证实有RLS的患者中观察到的检测到的RLS分级增加一致。因此,作者建议不仅在超声骨窗不佳的患者中,而且在每一位疑似RLS的评估患者中都纳入ecICA PMD检查。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验