Duan Zhihui, Yang Zhiyuan, Song Binbin, Ma Congmin, Li Yan, Du Yanjiao, Shang Dandan, Li Shao, Lou Jiyu
a Department of Neurology , The 2ndAffiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University , Zhengzhou , P.R.China.
b Department of Neurology , Luoyang Central Hospital Affiliated to Zhengzhou University , Luoyang , Henan , P. R. China.
Neurol Res. 2018 Mar;40(3):197-203. doi: 10.1080/01616412.2018.1428276. Epub 2018 Jan 19.
Background Transtemporal Doppler (TTD) with middle cerebral artery (MCA) is widely used for right-to-left shunt (RLS) detection. However, an alternative method for patients without suitable temporal bone windows should be established. The present study prospectively evaluated the effectiveness of transorbital Doppler (TOD) with carotid siphon (CS) monitoring in detecting RLS. Methods A total of 357 subjects with sufficient temporal bone windows underwent simultaneous TTD with MCA and TOD with CS. After injection of microbubbles, the numbers of artificial high-intensity signals were recorded at rest and after Valsalva maneuver. Results TOD with CS detected RLS in 146 patients. Sensitivity was 97.1%, specificity 95%, positive predictive value 92.5%, and negative predictive value 98.1%. The total positive rates for RLS detection by CS (40.9%) and MCA (37.8%) monitoring were comparable without significant difference, but TOD with CS detected significantly more grade 2 and 3 RLS than TTD with MCA (p = 0.001). The RLS rates of cryptogenic stroke patients was significantly higher than that of healthy controls, and RLS in cryptogenic stroke was remarkably higher than that in transient ischemia attack patients (p < 0.05). TOD with CS examined significantly more grade 2 and 3 RLSs than the MCA approach in the cryptogenic stroke patients (p = 0.037). Conclusion TOD with CS monitoring is able to detect RLS effectively in different populations including healthy subjects, cryptogenic stroke, transient ischemia attack, and migraine patients. In comparing to the TTD with MCA approach, TOD with CS monitoring could detect comparable rate of RLS, but more high grades of RLS.
经颞部多普勒(TTD)联合大脑中动脉(MCA)广泛用于检测右向左分流(RLS)。然而,对于没有合适颞骨窗的患者,应建立一种替代方法。本研究前瞻性评估经眶多普勒(TOD)联合颈动脉虹吸部(CS)监测在检测RLS中的有效性。方法:共有357例有足够颞骨窗的受试者同时接受了TTD联合MCA以及TOD联合CS检查。注射微泡后,记录静息状态和瓦尔萨尔瓦动作后人工高强度信号的数量。结果:TOD联合CS检测出146例RLS患者。敏感性为97.1%,特异性为95%,阳性预测值为92.5%,阴性预测值为98.1%。CS监测(40.9%)和MCA监测(37.8%)检测RLS的总阳性率相当,无显著差异,但TOD联合CS检测出的2级和3级RLS明显多于TTD联合MCA(p = 0.001)。隐源性卒中患者的RLS发生率明显高于健康对照者,且隐源性卒中患者的RLS明显高于短暂性脑缺血发作患者(p < 0.05)。在隐源性卒中患者中,TOD联合CS检测出的2级和3级RLS明显多于MCA方法(p = 0.037)。结论:TOD联合CS监测能够在包括健康受试者、隐源性卒中、短暂性脑缺血发作和偏头痛患者在内的不同人群中有效检测RLS。与TTD联合MCA方法相比,TOD联合CS监测能检测出相当比例的RLS,但能检测出更多高级别的RLS。