Marenghi Anna, Ceriani Elisa, Fiorelli Elisa Maria, Bonzi Mattia, Montano Nicola, Annoni Federico
Department of Internal Medicine, Allergology and Immunology, Foundation IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy.
Department of Internal Medicine, L. Sacco Hospital, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
J Cardiovasc Echogr. 2020 Oct-Dec;30(4):201-205. doi: 10.4103/jcecho.jcecho_70_20. Epub 2021 Jan 20.
Right-to-left cardiac shunt is a condition anatomically related to patent foramen ovale (PFO) and potentially related to cryptogenic cerebrovascular events. As recent studies demonstrated a reduction of recurrent stroke in patients undergoing percutaneous PFO closure after a cryptogenic cerebrovascular event, it is now of pivotal importance to screen these patients for Right-to-left shunt(RLS) presence. At this regard, transcranial color Doppler (TCCD) with contrast has a good sensitivity (97%) and specificity (93%) compared to transesophageal echocardiography and became the test of choice to assess RLS presence, thanks to its noninvasive nature. However, temporal bone window is not accessible in 6%-20% patients. Several approaches have been explored to overcome this limitation with encouraging but not definitive results for extracranial internal carotid artery (ICA) approach, proposed in previous pivotal studies. Aims of this study were to further assess the diagnostic accuracy of ICA Doppler ultrasound with contrast for RLS detection compared to TCCD, with the two tests performed simultaneously.
Sixty-four patients underwent simultaneously to TCCD and ICA Doppler ultrasound, both performed at rest and after Valsalva maneuver. Diagnosis of RLS was made, both for TCCD and ICA ultrasound, if=1 microembolic signals (MES) were detected during the examination (either at rest or after Valsalva maneuver).
ICA Doppler ultrasound sensitivity and specificity resulted respectively of 97% (confidence interval [CI] 95%) and 100% ([CI] 95%), while negative likelihood ratio was 0.03 (CI 95%).
ICA Doppler ultrasound represents a valid alternative to TCCD for RLS screening in patients without adequate transcranial acoustic window.
右向左心脏分流是一种在解剖学上与卵圆孔未闭(PFO)相关的病症,并且可能与不明原因的脑血管事件有关。由于最近的研究表明,不明原因脑血管事件后接受经皮PFO封堵术的患者复发性中风有所减少,因此现在对这些患者进行右向左分流(RLS)筛查至关重要。在这方面,与经食管超声心动图相比,经颅彩色多普勒(TCCD)造影具有良好的敏感性(97%)和特异性(93%),并且由于其非侵入性,已成为评估RLS存在的首选检查方法。然而,6%-20%的患者无法获得颞骨窗。此前的关键研究提出了几种方法来克服这一局限性,其中颅外颈内动脉(ICA)方法取得了令人鼓舞但尚未确定的结果。本研究的目的是与TCCD同时进行这两项检查,进一步评估ICA多普勒超声造影检测RLS的诊断准确性。
64例患者同时接受TCCD和ICA多普勒超声检查,检查均在静息状态和瓦尔萨尔瓦动作后进行。如果在检查期间(静息状态或瓦尔萨尔瓦动作后)检测到≥1个微栓塞信号(MES),则TCCD和ICA超声均诊断为RLS。
ICA多普勒超声的敏感性和特异性分别为97%(置信区间[CI] 95%)和100%([CI] 95%),而阴性似然比为0.03(CI 95%)。
对于没有足够经颅声学窗的患者,ICA多普勒超声是TCCD进行RLS筛查的有效替代方法。