Schauer Uwe, Stemberg Frank, Rieger Christian H L, Borte Michael, Schubert Simone, Riedel Frank, Herz Udo, Renz Harald, Wick Manfred, Carr-Smith Hugh D, Bradwell Arthur R, Herzog Wilhelm
Klinik für Kinder- und Jugendmedizin der Ruhr Universität Bochum, D-44791 Bochum, Germany.
Clin Chem. 2003 Nov;49(11):1924-9. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2003.022350.
There is currently no international reference preparation for IgG subclass (IgGSc) quantification. This situation has led to calibration differences among assays and a variety of reference interval values with consequential difficulties in comparing results. We therefore evaluated IgGSc concentrations in Certified Reference Material 470 (CRM 470).
Pure, polyclonal IgG1, -2, -3, and -4 were prepared from a large serum pool for use as primary standards. The IgG mass in each preparation was calculated from amino-acid analysis data. IgGSc concentrations were assessed in CRM 470 by nephelometry with modern analytical techniques, using these reference preparations. Subsequently, IgGSc concentrations were measured in 380 healthy individuals (250 males and 130 females), and age-dependent reference intervals were established.
IgGSc concentrations in CRM 470 were as follows: IgG1, 5028 mg/L; IgG2, 3418 mg/L; IgG3, 579 mg/L, and IgG4, 381 mg/L, with a total IgG concentration of 9406 mg/L, 2.83% below the certified total IgG value of 9680 mg/L. Age-dependent percentile curves for the four IgGSc were constructed using a Box-Cox transformation. Maximum median values were as follows: IgG1, 6.02 g/L at 11 years; IgG2, 3.45 g/L at 31 years; IgG3, 0.63 g/L at 17 years; and IgG4, 0.48 g/L at 14 years. No significant sex-related differences were observed.
The correlation between the summation of individual IgGSc and separate measurements of total IgG concentrations was good and supports the accuracy of the results. The results are based on The Binding Site assays and should not be considered appropriate for other assays unless so demonstrated.
目前尚无用于IgG亚类(IgGSc)定量的国际参考制剂。这种情况导致了不同检测方法之间的校准差异以及各种参考区间值,从而在比较结果时产生困难。因此,我们评估了认证参考物质470(CRM 470)中的IgGSc浓度。
从大量血清库中制备纯的多克隆IgG1、-2、-3和-4用作一级标准品。根据氨基酸分析数据计算每种制剂中的IgG质量。使用这些参考制剂,通过现代分析技术的散射比浊法评估CRM 470中的IgGSc浓度。随后,对380名健康个体(250名男性和130名女性)进行IgGSc浓度测量,并建立年龄相关的参考区间。
CRM 470中的IgGSc浓度如下:IgG1为5028 mg/L;IgG2为3418 mg/L;IgG3为579 mg/L,IgG4为381 mg/L,总IgG浓度为9406 mg/L,比认证的总IgG值9680 mg/L低2.83%。使用Box-Cox变换构建了四种IgGSc的年龄相关百分位数曲线。最大中位数如下:IgG1在11岁时为6.02 g/L;IgG2在31岁时为3.45 g/L;IgG3在17岁时为0.63 g/L;IgG4在14岁时为0.48 g/L。未观察到明显的性别相关差异。
个体IgGSc总和与总IgG浓度单独测量之间的相关性良好,支持结果的准确性。这些结果基于The Binding Site检测方法,除非另有证明,否则不应认为适用于其他检测方法。