Suppr超能文献

免疫比浊法和化学发光免疫分析法检测 IgG 亚类在中国的临床性能。

Clinical Performance of Immunonephelometric Assay and Chemiluminescent Immunoassay for Detection of IgG Subclasses in Chinese.

机构信息

Department of Rheumatology, the Second Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, Shanxi, China.

Shanxi Center for Clinical Laboratory, Taiyuan, Shanxi, China.

出版信息

J Clin Lab Anal. 2024 Apr;38(8):e25033. doi: 10.1002/jcla.25033. Epub 2024 Apr 2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Detection of IgG subclasses (IgGSc) is vital for the diagnosis and management of disease, especially IgG4-related diseases (IgG4-RD). This study aimed to evaluate the performances of the chemiluminescent immunoassay (CLIA) for detecting IgGSc and diagnosing IgG4-RD by IgGSc.

METHODS

A total of 40 individuals with IgG4-RD, 40 with primary Sjogren's syndrome (pSS), and 40 healthy controls (HCs) were enrolled. Serum samples were collected for the simultaneous detection of IgG1, IgG2, IgG3, and IgG4 by the Siemens immunonephelometric assay and the CLIA. The correlation analysis was performed, and diagnostic value was analyzed by the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.

RESULTS

Patients with IgG4-RD had higher IgG4 (p < 0.001) and lower IgG1 (p < 0.001) than those with pSS, and HC. The results by the Siemens immunonephelometric assay and the CLIA showed a strong correlation in detecting IgG1, IgG2, IgG3, and IgG4 (r = 0.937, r = 0.847, r = 0.871, r = 0.990, all p < 0.001, respectively). The sum of IgG1, IgG2, IgG3, and IgG4 using two assays strongly correlated with total IgG by the IMMAGE 800 (r = 0.866, r = 0.811, both p < 0.001, respectively). For discriminating IgG4-RD from pSS and HC, no significant differences were observed in CLIA IgG4 and Siemens immunonephelometric assay IgG4 (z = 0.138, p = 0.891), which provided the area under the curves (AUCs) of 0.951 (p < 0.001) and 0.950 (p < 0.001), respectively. The AUCs of CLIA IgG1 and Siemens immunonephelometric assay IgG1 in distinguishing pSS from IgG4-RD and HC were 0.761 (p < 0.001) and 0.765 (p < 0.001), respectively, with no significant differences (z = 0.228, p = 0.820).

CONCLUSIONS

The CLIA and the Siemens immunonephelometric assay appeared to have good consistency with comparable diagnostic value in detecting IgGSc, especially IgG4, and IgG1 that can accurately identify IgG4-RD or pSS in clinical practice.

摘要

背景

IgG 亚类(IgGSc)的检测对于疾病的诊断和管理至关重要,尤其是 IgG4 相关疾病(IgG4-RD)。本研究旨在评估化学发光免疫分析(CLIA)检测 IgGSc 的性能,并通过 IgGSc 诊断 IgG4-RD。

方法

共纳入 40 例 IgG4-RD 患者、40 例原发性干燥综合征(pSS)患者和 40 例健康对照者(HCs)。采集血清样本,采用西门子免疫比浊法和 CLIA 同时检测 IgG1、IgG2、IgG3 和 IgG4。进行相关性分析,并通过受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析诊断价值。

结果

与 pSS 患者和 HCs 相比,IgG4-RD 患者的 IgG4 水平更高(p<0.001),而 IgG1 水平更低(p<0.001)。西门子免疫比浊法和 CLIA 检测 IgG1、IgG2、IgG3 和 IgG4 的结果具有很强的相关性(r=0.937、r=0.847、r=0.871、r=0.990,均 p<0.001)。两种检测方法检测的 IgG1、IgG2、IgG3 和 IgG4 之和与 IMMAGE 800 检测的总 IgG 具有很强的相关性(r=0.866、r=0.811,均 p<0.001)。对于鉴别 IgG4-RD 与 pSS 和 HCs,CLIA IgG4 和西门子免疫比浊法 IgG4 之间无显著差异(z=0.138,p=0.891),其曲线下面积(AUC)分别为 0.951(p<0.001)和 0.950(p<0.001)。CLIA IgG1 和西门子免疫比浊法 IgG1 鉴别 pSS 与 IgG4-RD 和 HCs 的 AUC 分别为 0.761(p<0.001)和 0.765(p<0.001),无显著差异(z=0.228,p=0.820)。

结论

CLIA 和西门子免疫比浊法在检测 IgGSc,尤其是 IgG4 和 IgG1 方面具有良好的一致性,且具有相当的诊断价值,可在临床实践中准确识别 IgG4-RD 或 pSS。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3dfd/11073813/5194f9e1886b/JCLA-38-e25033-g005.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验