Ducharme James, Matheson Kim
Department of Emergency Medicine, Saint John Regional Hospital, New Brunswick, Canada.
J Emerg Nurs. 2003 Oct;29(5):427-30. doi: 10.1016/s0099-1767(03)00295-2.
Nasogastric intubation has been shown to be a painful procedure for patients. Previous studies have demonstrated the benefit of topical nasal anesthesia in decreasing the pain of this procedure. This study attempts to identify which of 3 topical anesthetic modalities would be preferred by patients.
This study had a double-blind, double-dummy randomized triple crossover design with 30 healthy volunteers as participants. Each participant had 3 nasogastric tubes inserted and acted as his or her own control for the 3 study medications: 1.5 mL 4% atomized lidocaine, 1.5 mL 4% atomized cocaine, and 5 mL 2% lidocaine gel. Participants scored pain of tube passage through the nostril as well as global discomfort. They were also asked to identify which agent they preferred.
In our 30 subjects, although no statistically significant difference in nasal pain scores was found, "global discomfort" was less with the lidocaine gel (P =.017). Participants preferred the lidocaine gel over atomized cocaine (P <.00), but not to a statistically significant degree.
Two percent lidocaine gel appeared to provide the best option for a topical anesthetic during nasogastric tube insertion.
鼻胃管插管对患者来说是一种痛苦的操作。先前的研究已证明局部鼻腔麻醉在减轻该操作疼痛方面的益处。本研究旨在确定患者更倾向于三种局部麻醉方式中的哪一种。
本研究采用双盲、双模拟随机三交叉设计,30名健康志愿者作为参与者。每位参与者插入3根鼻胃管,并作为自己的对照来使用3种研究药物:1.5毫升4%雾化利多卡因、1.5毫升4%雾化可卡因和5毫升2%利多卡因凝胶。参与者对鼻胃管通过鼻孔时的疼痛以及总体不适进行评分。他们还被要求指出自己更喜欢哪种药物。
在我们的30名受试者中,虽然未发现鼻痛评分有统计学上的显著差异,但利多卡因凝胶组的“总体不适”较轻(P = 0.017)。参与者更喜欢利多卡因凝胶而非雾化可卡因(P < 0.00),但差异无统计学意义。
2%利多卡因凝胶似乎是鼻胃管插管期间局部麻醉的最佳选择。