Hughes D, Simmons S W, Brown J, Cyna A M
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003(4):CD003401. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003401.
Traditional epidural techniques have been associated with prolonged labour, use of oxytocin augmentation, and increased incidence of instrumental vaginal delivery. The combined spinal-epidural (CSE) technique has been introduced in an attempt to reduce these adverse effects. CSE is believed to improve maternal mobility during labour and provide more rapid onset of analgesia than epidural analgesia.
To assess the relative effects of combined spinal-epidural versus epidural analgesia during labour.
The Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group Trials Register (July 2002), the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (The Cochrane Library, Issue 3, 2002), MEDLINE (1966 to June 2002) and EMBASE (1974 to June 2002).
All published randomised controlled trials involving a comparison of CSE with epidural analgesia initiated for women in the first stage of labour.
Trials identified from searching were assessed for inclusion by the same two reviewers independently. Review Manager software was used for calculation of the treatment effect represented by odds ratios (OR) and weighted mean difference (WMD) using a fixed effects model with 95% confidence intervals (CI).
Fourteen trials (2047 women) met our inclusion criteria. Of the 25 outcomes analysed from these studies CSE shows a reduced time from first injection to effective maternal analgesia WMD -5.50 minutes (95% CI -6.47 to -4.52; four trials), an increased incidence of maternal satisfaction OR 4.69 (95% CI 1.27 to 17.29; three trials), and an increased incidence of pruritus OR 2.79 (95% CI 1.87 to 4.18; nine trials). No difference was found between CSE and epidural techniques with regards to maternal mobility, rescue analgesia requirements, the incidence of post dural puncture headache (PDPH) or blood patch, hypotension, urinary retention, mode of delivery, or admission of the baby to the neonatal unit.
REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: There is no standard CSE or epidural technique. Compared with epidural, CSE provides faster onset of effective pain relief from the time of injection, and increases the incidence of maternal satisfaction. However, CSE women experience more itch. There is no difference between CSE and epidural techniques with respect to: the incidence of forceps delivery, maternal mobility, PDPH, caesarean section rates or admission of babies to the neonatal unit. It is not possible to draw any meaningful conclusions regarding rare complications such as nerve injury and meningitis.
传统硬膜外技术与产程延长、使用缩宫素加强宫缩以及器械助产阴道分娩发生率增加有关。联合腰麻-硬膜外麻醉(CSE)技术已被引入,试图减少这些不良反应。CSE被认为可改善产妇分娩时的活动能力,并比硬膜外镇痛起效更快。
评估分娩期间联合腰麻-硬膜外麻醉与硬膜外镇痛的相对效果。
考克兰妊娠与分娩组试验注册库(2002年7月)、考克兰对照试验注册库(《考克兰图书馆》,2002年第3期)、医学索引在线数据库(1966年至2002年6月)和荷兰医学文摘数据库(1974年至2002年6月)。
所有已发表的随机对照试验,涉及对第一产程妇女开始使用的CSE与硬膜外镇痛进行比较。
由两名审阅者独立评估检索到的试验是否符合纳入标准。使用Review Manager软件,采用固定效应模型并结合95%置信区间(CI),计算以比值比(OR)和加权均数差(WMD)表示的治疗效果。
14项试验(2047名妇女)符合我们的纳入标准。从这些研究分析的25项结果中,CSE显示从首次注射到产妇有效镇痛的时间缩短,WMD为-5.50分钟(95%CI -6.47至-4.52;4项试验),产妇满意度发生率增加,OR为4.69(95%CI 1.27至17.29;3项试验),瘙痒发生率增加,OR为2.79(95%CI 1.87至4.18;9项试验)。在产妇活动能力、补救性镇痛需求、硬膜外穿刺后头痛(PDPH)或血补丁发生率、低血压、尿潴留、分娩方式或婴儿入住新生儿病房方面,CSE与硬膜外技术之间未发现差异。
不存在标准的CSE或硬膜外技术。与硬膜外麻醉相比,CSE从注射时起提供更快的有效疼痛缓解,且增加了产妇满意度发生率。然而,接受CSE的妇女瘙痒更多。在以下方面,CSE与硬膜外技术之间无差异:产钳助产发生率、产妇活动能力、PDPH、剖宫产率或婴儿入住新生儿病房情况。对于神经损伤和脑膜炎等罕见并发症,无法得出任何有意义的结论。