Collins C T, Makrides M, McPhee A J
Dept Nursing & Midwifery Research & Practice Development, Women's and Children's Hospital, 72 King William Road, North Adelaide, South Australia, Australia, 5006.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003(4):CD003743. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003743.
Early discharge of stable preterm infants still requiring gavage feeds has the potential benefits of uniting families sooner and reducing health care and family costs compared to discharge home when on full sucking feeds. Potential disadvantages include the increased burden for the family and the possibility of complications related to gavage feeding.
To determine the effects of a policy of early discharge of stable preterm infants with home support of gavage feeding compared with a policy of discharge of such infants when they have reached full sucking feeds.
The standard search strategy of the Cochrane Neonatal Review Group was used together with additional searches of the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library, Issue 1, 2003), CINAHL (1982 to April week 1 2003), EMBASE (1980 to 2003 week 15) and MEDLINE (1966 to April week 1 2003).
All randomised and quasi-randomised trials among infants born <37 weeks and requiring no intravenous nutrition at the point of discharge were included. Trials were required to compare early discharge home with gavage feeds and health care support with later discharge home when full sucking feeds were attained.
Two reviewers independently assessed trial quality and extracted data. Study authors were contacted for additional information. Data analysis was done in accordance with the standards of the Cochrane Neonatal Review Group.
Data from one quasi-randomised trial, with 88 infants from 75 families, were included in the review. Infants in the early discharge program with home gavage feeding had a mean hospital stay that was 9.3 days shorter [MD -9.3 (-18.49 to -0.11)] than infants in the control group. Infants in the early discharge program also had a lower risk of clinical infection during the home gavage period compared with the corresponding time in hospital for the control group [RR 0.35 (0.17 to 0.69)]. There were no significant differences between groups in duration and extent of breast feeding, weight gain, re-admission within the first 12 months post discharge from the home gavage program or from hospital, scores reflecting parental satisfaction, or health service use.
REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: Experimental evidence to evaluate the benefits and risks in preterm infants of early discharge from hospital with home gavage feeding compared with later discharge upon attainment of full sucking feeds is limited to the results of one small quasi-randomised controlled trial. High quality trials with concealed allocation, complete follow-up of all randomised infants and adequate sample size are needed before practice recommendations can be made.
与经口全量喂养后出院相比,对仍需管饲喂养的稳定早产婴儿实施早期出院具有一些潜在益处,如能更快让家庭团聚,并降低医疗保健和家庭成本。潜在的不利因素包括家庭负担增加以及与管饲喂养相关的并发症风险。
确定对稳定早产婴儿实施早期出院并提供家庭管饲喂养支持的政策,与这类婴儿经口全量喂养后出院的政策相比所产生的影响。
采用Cochrane新生儿综述小组的标准检索策略,同时额外检索Cochrane对照试验中心注册库(《Cochrane图书馆》,2003年第1期)、护理学与健康领域数据库(1982年至2003年4月第1周)、荷兰医学文摘数据库(1980年至2003年第15周)和医学期刊数据库(1966年至2003年4月第1周)。
纳入所有出生孕周<37周且出院时无需静脉营养的婴儿的随机和半随机试验。试验需比较早期出院并接受管饲喂养及医疗保健支持与经口全量喂养后较晚出院的情况。
两名评价员独立评估试验质量并提取数据。与研究作者联系以获取更多信息。数据分析按照Cochrane新生儿综述小组的标准进行。
本综述纳入了一项半随机试验的数据,涉及来自75个家庭的88名婴儿。早期出院并接受家庭管饲喂养的婴儿平均住院时间比对照组婴儿短9.3天[平均差 -9.3(-18.49至-0.11)]。与对照组住院相应时间段相比,早期出院项目中的婴儿在家庭管饲期间临床感染风险也更低[相对危险度0.35(0.17至0.69)]。两组在母乳喂养的持续时间和程度、体重增加、家庭管饲项目出院后或出院后12个月内再次入院、反映父母满意度的评分或卫生服务利用方面均无显著差异。
与经口全量喂养后较晚出院相比,评估早期出院并进行家庭管饲喂养的早产婴儿的益处和风险的实验证据仅限于一项小型半随机对照试验的结果。在提出实践建议之前,需要进行高质量的试验,包括采用隐匿分组、对所有随机分组的婴儿进行完整随访以及足够的样本量。