Bastiaansen Marcel, Hagoort Peter
Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, F.C. Donders Centre for Cognitive Neuroimaging, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Cortex. 2003 Sep-Dec;39(4-5):967-92. doi: 10.1016/s0010-9452(08)70873-6.
An important, but often ignored distinction in the analysis of EEG signals is that between evoked activity and induced activity. Whereas evoked activity reflects the summation of transient post-synaptic potentials triggered by an event, induced activity, which is mainly oscillatory in nature, is thought to reflect changes in parameters controlling dynamic interactions within and between brain structures. We hypothesize that induced activity may yield information about the dynamics of cell assembly formation, activation and subsequent uncoupling, which may play a prominent role in different types of memory operations. We then describe a number of analysis tools that can be used to study the reactivity of induced rhythmic activity, both in terms of amplitude changes and of phase variability. We briefly discuss how alpha, gamma and theta rhythms are thought to be generated, paying special attention to the hypothesis that the theta rhythm reflects dynamic interactions between the hippocampal system and the neocortex. This hypothesis would imply that studying the reactivity of scalp-recorded theta may provide a window on the contribution of the hippocampus to memory functions. We review studies investigating the reactivity of scalp-recorded theta in paradigms engaging episodic memory, spatial memory and working memory. In addition, we review studies that relate theta reactivity to processes at the interface of memory and language. Despite many unknowns, the experimental evidence largely supports the hypothesis that theta activity plays a functional role in cell assembly formation, a process which may constitute the neural basis of memory formation and retrieval. The available data provide only highly indirect support for the hypothesis that scalp-recorded theta yields information about hippocampal functioning. It is concluded that studying induced rhythmic activity holds promise as an additional important way to study brain function.
在脑电图信号分析中,一个重要但常被忽视的区别是诱发活动和诱导活动之间的区别。诱发活动反映了由一个事件触发的瞬态突触后电位的总和,而诱导活动主要是振荡性的,被认为反映了控制脑结构内部和之间动态相互作用的参数变化。我们假设诱导活动可能产生有关细胞集合形成、激活和随后解耦动态的信息,这可能在不同类型的记忆操作中起重要作用。然后,我们描述了一些分析工具,这些工具可用于研究诱导节律活动的反应性,包括幅度变化和相位变异性方面。我们简要讨论了α、γ和θ节律被认为是如何产生的,特别关注θ节律反映海马系统和新皮层之间动态相互作用的假设。这一假设意味着,研究头皮记录的θ的反应性可能为海马体对记忆功能的贡献提供一个窗口。我们回顾了在情景记忆、空间记忆和工作记忆范式中研究头皮记录的θ反应性的研究。此外,我们还回顾了将θ反应性与记忆和语言界面过程相关联的研究。尽管有许多未知因素,但实验证据在很大程度上支持了θ活动在细胞集合形成中起功能作用的假设,这一过程可能构成记忆形成和检索的神经基础。现有数据仅为头皮记录的θ产生有关海马体功能信息的假设提供了高度间接的支持。结论是,研究诱导节律活动有望成为研究脑功能的另一种重要方式。