Suppr超能文献

创伤系统的接入与评估中的骨折问题。

Fractures in access to and assessment of trauma systems.

作者信息

Vassar Mary J, Holcroft John J, Knudson M Margaret, Kizer Kenneth W

机构信息

San Francisco Injury Center, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.

出版信息

J Am Coll Surg. 2003 Nov;197(5):717-25. doi: 10.1016/S1072-7515(03)00749-X.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Trauma is a major public health problem and organized systems of trauma care have been shown to substantially reduce trauma-related mortality. Currently California and many other states have incompletely developed systems of trauma care delivery. This study was undertaken to determine how frequently patients incurring serious trauma in California receive treatment at a trauma center.

STUDY DESIGN

Hospital discharge records for 360,743 acute trauma patients for 1995 to 1997 were analyzed. Abbreviated Injury Scale scores were calculated from discharge diagnosis codes. Severity of trauma and the need for trauma center treatment was defined by eight Abbreviated Injury Scale criteria combined with patient age and type of injury.

RESULTS

According to study criteria, 67,718 patients needed trauma center care and 56% were treated at a trauma center. Among patients less than 55 years of age, 62% were treated at a trauma center compared with 40% of those aged 55 years or more (p < 0.0001). For patients less than 55 years old with brain injuries, 66% were treated at a trauma center compared with 44% for patients aged 55 years or more (p < 0.0001). Of the 29,849 patients who met Abbreviated Injury Scale criteria but were not treated at trauma centers, 59% were in counties with designated trauma centers and 41% were in counties without trauma centers.

CONCLUSIONS

Only 56% of seriously injured patients in California were treated at trauma centers, despite most of the injuries occurring in the catchment areas of designated trauma care systems. Substantial undertriage of serious trauma patients to trauma centers appears to be occurring, especially in older persons and in persons with brain injuries. Efforts to understand why undertriage is occurring so frequently are hampered by fragmentation of the systems of care, inadequate data management systems, and lack of trauma care performance reporting by non-trauma center hospitals.

摘要

背景

创伤是一个重大的公共卫生问题,而有组织的创伤护理系统已被证明能大幅降低创伤相关死亡率。目前,加利福尼亚州和许多其他州的创伤护理提供系统发展并不完善。本研究旨在确定加利福尼亚州严重创伤患者在创伤中心接受治疗的频率。

研究设计

分析了1995年至1997年360,743例急性创伤患者的医院出院记录。根据出院诊断编码计算简明损伤定级(AIS)评分。创伤的严重程度和对创伤中心治疗的需求由八项简明损伤定级标准结合患者年龄和损伤类型来定义。

结果

根据研究标准,67,718名患者需要创伤中心护理,其中56%在创伤中心接受了治疗。在年龄小于55岁的患者中,62%在创伤中心接受了治疗,而55岁及以上患者的这一比例为40%(p<0.0001)。对于年龄小于55岁的脑损伤患者,66%在创伤中心接受了治疗,而55岁及以上患者的这一比例为44%(p<0.0001)。在符合简明损伤定级标准但未在创伤中心接受治疗的29,849名患者中,59%位于设有指定创伤中心的县,41%位于没有创伤中心的县。

结论

尽管大多数损伤发生在指定创伤护理系统的服务区域内,但加利福尼亚州只有56%的重伤患者在创伤中心接受了治疗。严重创伤患者被大量分流至非创伤中心,尤其是老年人和脑损伤患者。护理系统的碎片化、数据管理系统不完善以及非创伤中心医院缺乏创伤护理绩效报告,阻碍了对频繁发生分流不足原因的了解。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验