Ferrari Robert, Shorter Edward
History of Medicine Department, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Med Sci Monit. 2003 Nov;9(11):HY27-37.
The search for a specific structural basis for chronic whiplash and other chronic pain and fatigue syndromes has been in progress for decades, and yet currently there remains no "structural" solution to these enigmata. In light of the failure of research to identify the chronic "damage" or pathology as lying in a muscular, bony, or "connective tissue" sites for many chronic pain syndromes like whiplash, fibromyalgia, et cetera, more recent attention has been paid to nervous system structures. Nerve irritation has been implicated as the basis for the pain and other symptoms that are common to many chronic disability syndromes. We postulate here, however, that the concept of nervous irritation has been prostituted for centuries whenever more concrete structural explanations for chronic pain and other controversial illness have been untenable. We suggest that, after each cycle of nervous irritation as a disease, and subsequent dismissal of the notion, the doctrine of irritation as a disease was too good to go away. First, with the hypersthenic and asthenic diseases of the nineteenth century, then railway spine, whiplash, thoracic outlet syndrome, and now brachial plexus irritation, we detect the same pattern: patients with symptoms, but no objective evidence of nerve disease. Nervous irritation has repeatedly served this purpose for the last 200 years. It is our intent that bringing an understanding of this trend will encourage current clinicians and researchers to appreciate the need to abandon this form of speculation without historical insight when dealing with today's controversial syndromes.
对慢性挥鞭伤以及其他慢性疼痛和疲劳综合征的特定结构基础的探寻已经进行了数十年,但目前对于这些谜团仍没有“结构性”的解决方案。鉴于研究未能将许多慢性疼痛综合征(如挥鞭伤、纤维肌痛等)的慢性“损伤”或病理定位在肌肉、骨骼或“结缔组织”部位,最近人们更多地关注神经系统结构。神经刺激被认为是许多慢性残疾综合征常见的疼痛和其他症状的基础。然而,我们在此假定,每当对慢性疼痛和其他有争议疾病的更具体结构解释站不住脚时,神经刺激的概念已经被滥用了几个世纪。我们认为,在将神经刺激作为一种疾病的每个周期以及随后对该概念的摒弃之后,刺激作为一种疾病的学说因其太过“好用”而无法消失。首先,在19世纪的强壮症和虚弱症疾病中,然后是铁路脊椎病、挥鞭伤、胸廓出口综合征,现在是臂丛神经刺激,我们发现了相同的模式:有症状的患者,但没有神经疾病的客观证据。在过去的200年里,神经刺激一再起到这样的作用。我们的目的是,理解这一趋势将鼓励当前的临床医生和研究人员认识到,在处理当今有争议的综合征时,如果没有历史洞察力,就需要摒弃这种形式的推测。