Rohmiller Michael T, Schwalm Dugan, Glattes R Chris, Elalayli Tarek G, Spengler Dan M
Vanderbilt University, Department of Orthopedics and Rehabilitation, Vanderbilt University Spine Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Spine J. 2002 Jul-Aug;2(4):255-60. doi: 10.1016/s1529-9430(02)00207-3.
Many authors have evaluated the components responsible for ultimate pullout strength of pedicle screws. In these studies, one important variable has been the screw fixation. Because pedicle screw fixation has increased in popularity over recent years, so has the need for augmentation in difficult situations. Polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) has been established as the gold standard in terms of strength of fixation but has the potential for severe complications when applied in spine surgery. Calcium sulfate is an alternative to PMMA, because it lacks the exothermic reaction, is potentially osteoconductive and is resorbed by the body in 30 to 60 days.
To determine the strength of a new calcium sulfate cement in terms of pedicle screw augmentation. The purpose was to evaluate calcium sulfate versus PMMA in terms of pullout strength. PMMA was considered the gold standard in terms of strength for this experiment.
Lumbar vertebrae implanted with pedicle screws were subjected to axial pullout tests. The force required to cause implant failure was measured and compared for three methods of fixation.
Force to failure (Newtons) for each pedicle test was recorded and analyzed with results from similarly augmented pedicles.
Lumbar vertebrae were harvested from four cadavers and implanted with pedicle screws. These screws were either placed in native bone or augmented with either calcium sulfate paste or PMMA. In those pedicles that had augmentation, the material was permitted to set for a minimum of 24 hours. Axial pullout tests were then performed using an MTS (Materials Testing System Corporation, Minneapolis, MN) testing machine. The screws were pulled out over a distance of up to 6 mm at 0.25 mm/sec. This rate and distance ensured failure in each case. The load to failure was recorded for each pedicle.
Calcium sulfate augmentation improved pedicle screw pullout strength significantly when compared with native bone (p=.0003). This represented an average increase of 167% over the native bone. Likewise, PMMA improved the pullout strength significantly over native bone (p<.0001) for an average increase of 199%. There were no significant differences between the calcium sulfate and PMMA augmentation (p=.0791), although the PMMA averaged 119% of the strength of calcium sulfate.
Although PMMA is considered the gold standard in terms of fixation strength, its use around the spine has been limited because of concern over complications. The calcium sulfate bone paste tested in this study demonstrated strength similar to PMMA without the major risks to the spinal cord. In addition, the calcium sulfate paste allows for possible osteoconduction to aid in spinal fusion. Further study is needed to determine the applicability of this calcium sulfate paste in the clinical setting of spine surgery.
许多作者评估了影响椎弓根螺钉最终拔出强度的因素。在这些研究中,一个重要变量是螺钉固定。近年来,椎弓根螺钉固定越来越受欢迎,在困难情况下增加固定增强的需求也随之增加。就固定强度而言,聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯(PMMA)已被确立为金标准,但在脊柱手术中应用时存在严重并发症的风险。硫酸钙是PMMA的一种替代物,因为它没有放热反应,具有潜在的骨传导性,并且在30至60天内被身体吸收。
确定一种新型硫酸钙骨水泥在椎弓根螺钉增强方面的强度。目的是比较硫酸钙和PMMA的拔出强度。在本实验中,PMMA被视为强度方面的金标准。
对植入椎弓根螺钉的腰椎进行轴向拔出试验。测量导致植入物失效所需的力,并比较三种固定方法的结果。
记录每个椎弓根试验的失效力(牛顿),并与类似增强的椎弓根结果进行分析。
从四具尸体上获取腰椎并植入椎弓根螺钉。这些螺钉要么置于天然骨中,要么用硫酸钙糊剂或PMMA增强。在那些进行了增强的椎弓根中,材料至少放置24小时。然后使用MTS(明尼阿波利斯市材料测试系统公司,明尼苏达州)测试机进行轴向拔出试验。螺钉以0.25毫米/秒的速度拔出,最大拔出距离为6毫米。这个速度和距离确保每种情况下都能发生失效。记录每个椎弓根的失效载荷。
与天然骨相比,硫酸钙增强显著提高了椎弓根螺钉的拔出强度(p = 0.0003)。这比天然骨平均增加了167%。同样,PMMA也显著提高了相对于天然骨的拔出强度(p < 0.0001),平均增加了199%。硫酸钙和PMMA增强之间没有显著差异(p = 0.0791),尽管PMMA的强度平均为硫酸钙的119%。
尽管就固定强度而言,PMMA被视为金标准,但由于担心并发症,其在脊柱周围的使用受到限制。本研究中测试的硫酸钙骨糊剂显示出与PMMA相似的强度,且对脊髓没有重大风险。此外,硫酸钙糊剂可能具有骨传导性,有助于脊柱融合。需要进一步研究以确定这种硫酸钙糊剂在脊柱手术临床环境中的适用性。