Suppr超能文献

儿童注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)服务的CASA家长报告与服务提供者记录之间的一致性。

Agreement between CASA parent reports and provider records of children's ADHD services.

作者信息

Bussing Regina, Mason Dana M, Leon Christina E, Sinha Karabi

机构信息

Division of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Departments of Psychiatry, Pediatrics and of Health Policy and Epidemiology, University of Florida, Box 100157, UFHC, Gainesville, FL 32610-0157, USA.

出版信息

J Behav Health Serv Res. 2003 Oct-Dec;30(4):462-9. doi: 10.1007/BF02287433.

Abstract

This study examines agreement between parental reports of children's ADHD outpatient services ascertained with the Child and Adolescents Services Assessment (CASA) and provider records among a sample of elementary school students who participated in an epidemiologically based health services study. Parental reports of any outpatient mental health treatment, services intensity, and medication regimens were compared to records of the specified mental health and primary care providers using intraclass correlations and kappa estimates. Results indicated that parental reports using the CASA produced valid data on whether any outpatient ADHD services had been received in the past 12 months (83% agreement), and on details of the child's medication regimens (kappas above 0.90), but that agreement was poor on how many times the child had been seen (intraclass correlation 0.29), without agreement differences by provider type. These findings support the validity of using parental report for ADHD services in primary care settings and for study of medication regimens.

摘要

本研究调查了在一项基于流行病学的健康服务研究中,参与的小学生样本中,通过儿童和青少年服务评估(CASA)确定的儿童多动症门诊服务的家长报告与提供者记录之间的一致性。将任何门诊心理健康治疗、服务强度和药物治疗方案的家长报告与指定心理健康和初级保健提供者的记录进行比较,使用组内相关性和kappa估计。结果表明,使用CASA的家长报告在过去12个月内是否接受过任何门诊多动症服务(一致性为83%)以及儿童药物治疗方案的细节(kappa值高于0.90)方面产生了有效数据,但在孩子就诊次数方面一致性较差(组内相关性为0.29),且不同提供者类型之间的一致性没有差异。这些发现支持了在初级保健环境中使用家长报告来评估多动症服务以及研究药物治疗方案的有效性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验