• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

三家退伍军人事务疗养院不良躯体结局的指标

Indicators of adverse somatic outcome in three Veterans Affairs nursing homes.

作者信息

Alverno L, Mattson D E, Rudman D

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee.

出版信息

Hosp Community Psychiatry. 1992 Dec;43(12):1223-6. doi: 10.1176/ps.43.12.1223.

DOI:10.1176/ps.43.12.1223
PMID:1459545
Abstract

Frequencies of undernutrition, bedsores, and deterioration in activities of daily living were compared in three Veterans Affairs nursing homes serving both chronic psychiatric patients and medical or neurological patients. The three facilities varied in the proportions of patients with adverse outcomes, with one home having noticeably higher rates for both subgroups of patients. In each home, the two subgroups were equally likely to show evidence of adverse outcome, suggesting that differences in the frequency of adverse outcomes among the facilities were accounted for by extrinsic factors related to quality of care rather than intrinsic factors related to patient characteristics.

摘要

在三家为慢性精神病患者以及内科或神经科患者提供服务的退伍军人事务疗养院中,对营养不良、褥疮以及日常生活活动能力下降的发生率进行了比较。这三家机构在不良后果患者的比例上存在差异,其中一家机构中两个患者亚组的发生率明显更高。在每家机构中,两个亚组出现不良后果迹象的可能性相同,这表明机构间不良后果发生率的差异是由与护理质量相关的外在因素而非与患者特征相关的内在因素造成的。

相似文献

1
Indicators of adverse somatic outcome in three Veterans Affairs nursing homes.三家退伍军人事务疗养院不良躯体结局的指标
Hosp Community Psychiatry. 1992 Dec;43(12):1223-6. doi: 10.1176/ps.43.12.1223.
2
Clinical indicators derived from the patient assessment instrument in the long-stay residents of 69 VA nursing homes.从69家退伍军人事务部疗养院长期居住者的患者评估工具中得出的临床指标。
J Gen Intern Med. 1994 May;9(5):261-7. doi: 10.1007/BF02599652.
3
Quality improvement implementation in the nursing home.疗养院的质量改进实施
Health Serv Res. 2003 Feb;38(1 Pt 1):65-83. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.00105.
4
The occurrence of pressure ulcers in three nursing homes.三家养老院中压疮的发生情况。
J Gen Intern Med. 1993 Dec;8(12):653-8. doi: 10.1007/BF02598281.
5
Easily measurable adverse outcome indicators in a Veterans Affairs nursing home.退伍军人事务部疗养院中易于测量的不良结局指标。
QRB Qual Rev Bull. 1990 Jul;16(7):257-63. doi: 10.1016/s0097-5990(16)30375-x.
6
The effects of changes in nursing home staffing on pressure ulcer rates.疗养院人员配备变化对压疮发生率的影响。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2005 Jan-Feb;6(1):50-3. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2004.12.003.
7
Pressure ulcer development in the VA: characteristics of nursing homes providing best care.美国退伍军人事务部中压疮的发生情况:提供最佳护理的疗养院的特征
Am J Med Qual. 1999 Jan-Feb;14(1):39-44. doi: 10.1177/106286069901400106.
8
Quality of care and outcomes of chronic mentally ill patients in hospitals and nursing homes.医院和疗养院中慢性精神病患者的护理质量与治疗结果。
Hosp Community Psychiatry. 1993 Mar;44(3):241-6. doi: 10.1176/ps.44.3.241.
9
Quality improvement in nursing homes in Texas: results from a pressure ulcer prevention project.德克萨斯州养老院的质量改进:一项压疮预防项目的成果
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2005 May-Jun;6(3):181-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2005.03.011.
10
Purchasing or providing nursing home care: can quality of care data provide guidance.购买或提供养老院护理服务:护理质量数据能提供指导吗?
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005 Apr;53(4):603-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53207.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical indicators derived from the patient assessment instrument in the long-stay residents of 69 VA nursing homes.从69家退伍军人事务部疗养院长期居住者的患者评估工具中得出的临床指标。
J Gen Intern Med. 1994 May;9(5):261-7. doi: 10.1007/BF02599652.