Berlowitz Dan R, Young Gary J, Hickey Elaine C, Saliba Debra, Mittman Brian S, Czarnowski Elaine, Simon Barbara, Anderson Jennifer J, Ash Arlene S, Rubenstein Lisa V, Moskowitz Mark A
CHQOER, Bedford VA Hospital, MA 01730, USA.
Health Serv Res. 2003 Feb;38(1 Pt 1):65-83. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.00105.
To examine quality improvement (QI) implementation in nursing homes, its association with organizational culture, and its effects on pressure ulcer care.
DATA SOURCES/STUDY SETTING: Primary data were collected from staff at 35 nursing homes maintained by the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) on measures related to QI implementation and organizational culture. These data were combined with information obtained from abstractions of medical records and analyses of an existing database.
A cross-sectional analysis of the association among the different measures was performed.
DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION METHODS: Completed surveys containing information on QI implementation, organizational culture, employee satisfaction, and perceived adoption of guidelines were obtained from 1,065 nursing home staff. Adherence to best practices related to pressure ulcer prevention was abstracted from medical records. Risk-adjusted rates of pressure ulcer development were calculated from an administrative database.
Nursing homes differed significantly (p<.001) in their extent of QI implementation with scores on this 1 to 5 scale ranging from 2.98 to 4.08. Quality improvement implementation was greater in those nursing homes with an organizational culture that emphasizes innovation and teamwork. Employees of nursing homes with a greater degree of QI implementation were more satisfied with their jobs (a 1-point increase in QI score was associated with a 0.83 increase on the 5-point satisfaction scale, p<.001) and were more likely to report adoption of pressure ulcer clinical guidelines (a 1-point increase in QI score was associated with a 28 percent increase in number of staff reporting adoption, p<.001). No significant association was found, though, between QI implementation and either adherence to guideline recommendations as abstracted from records or the rate of pressure ulcer development.
Quality improvement implementation is most likely to be successful in those VA nursing homes with an underlying culture that promotes innovation. While QI implementation may result in staff who are more satisfied with their jobs and who believe they are providing better care, associations with improved care are uncertain.
研究疗养院质量改进(QI)的实施情况、其与组织文化的关联以及对压疮护理的影响。
数据来源/研究背景:主要数据收集自退伍军人事务部(VA)管理的35家疗养院的工作人员,内容涉及QI实施和组织文化相关措施。这些数据与从病历摘要及现有数据库分析中获取的信息相结合。
对不同措施之间的关联进行横断面分析。
数据收集/提取方法:从1065名疗养院工作人员处获得了完整的调查问卷,内容包括QI实施、组织文化、员工满意度以及对指南的认知采用情况。从病历中提取与压疮预防相关的最佳实践依从情况。从管理数据库中计算出压疮发生的风险调整率。
疗养院在QI实施程度上存在显著差异(p<.001),在此1至5分的量表上得分范围为2.98至4.08。在强调创新和团队合作的组织文化的疗养院中,质量改进实施情况更好。QI实施程度较高的疗养院员工对工作更满意(QI得分每增加1分,在5分量表上的满意度增加0.83,p<.001),并且更有可能报告采用了压疮临床指南(QI得分每增加1分,报告采用的工作人员数量增加28%,p<.001)。然而,未发现QI实施与病历摘要中指南建议的依从情况或压疮发生率之间存在显著关联。
在具有促进创新的潜在文化的VA疗养院中,质量改进实施最有可能取得成功。虽然QI实施可能会使员工对工作更满意,并认为他们提供了更好的护理,但与改善护理之间的关联尚不确定。