Suppr超能文献

文拉法辛缓释片治疗基层医疗中广泛性焦虑症患者的双盲、随机、安慰剂对照研究。

A double-blind, randomised, placebo controlled study of venlafaxine XL in patients with generalised anxiety disorder in primary care.

作者信息

Lenox-Smith Alan J, Reynolds Alan

机构信息

Medical Department, Wyeth Pharmaceuticals, Huntercombe Lane South, Taplow, SL6 0PH.

出版信息

Br J Gen Pract. 2003 Oct;53(495):772-7.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Generalised anxiety disorder (GAD) is one of the commonest anxiety disorders and is treated almost entirely in primary care. Most recent studies performed in GAD have excluded depression for regulatory reasons. As GAD is usually a co-morbid disease, often co-existing with depression, the results from recent studies have only limited relevance to the naturalistic population. This study was set up to investigate venlafaxine XL in a more naturalistic population of patients with GAD.

AIM

To assess the efficacy of venlafaxine XL in patients with generalised anxiety disorder with and without co-morbid depression.

DESIGN OF STUDY

Double-blind, randomised, placebo controlled, parallel-group, 24-week study.

SETTING

Primary care in the UK.

METHODS

Patients enrolled in the study were over 18 years old, met DSM-IV criteria for GAD, and had a score of 20 or more on the Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAM-A). A score of more than 23 on the Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) excluded patients. Eligible patients were randomised to receive 75 mg of venlafaxine or a matching placebo. After 2 weeks the dose could be doubled if the physician considered the response to be poor. The study duration was 24 weeks.

RESULTS

244 patients were enrolled, with 122 randomised to the placebo and 122 to venlafaxine. Baseline characteristics were similar for both groups, each having a mean total HAM-A score at baseline of 28. The difference from the placebo group at 24 weeks on the total HAM-A score was 2.1 points (95% 0 to 4.2), which was statistically significant (P = 0.05). Remission rates at week 24 were 27.9% for the venlafaxine XL group and 18.9% for placebo group (P = 0.11).

CONCLUSION

Venlafaxine was efficacious in the treatment of patients with GAD with and without depression over a 24-week period.

摘要

背景

广泛性焦虑障碍(GAD)是最常见的焦虑症之一,几乎完全在初级保健机构中进行治疗。最近针对广泛性焦虑障碍开展的大多数研究因监管原因排除了抑郁症患者。由于广泛性焦虑障碍通常是一种共病,常与抑郁症并存,因此最近研究的结果与自然状态下的患者群体仅有有限的相关性。本研究旨在调查在更接近自然状态的广泛性焦虑障碍患者群体中使用文拉法辛缓释片(venlafaxine XL)的情况。

目的

评估文拉法辛缓释片在伴有或不伴有共病抑郁症的广泛性焦虑障碍患者中的疗效。

研究设计

双盲、随机、安慰剂对照、平行组、为期24周的研究。

研究地点

英国的初级保健机构。

方法

纳入研究的患者年龄超过18岁,符合广泛性焦虑障碍的DSM-IV标准,且汉密尔顿焦虑量表(HAM-A)评分达到20分或更高。蒙哥马利-艾森伯格抑郁评定量表(MADRS)评分超过23分的患者被排除。符合条件的患者被随机分配接受75毫克文拉法辛或匹配的安慰剂。2周后,如果医生认为反应不佳,剂量可加倍。研究持续时间为24周。

结果

共纳入244例患者,其中122例随机分配至安慰剂组,122例随机分配至文拉法辛组。两组的基线特征相似,每组基线时HAM-A总分的平均值均为28分。在第24周时,文拉法辛组与安慰剂组在HAM-A总分上的差异为2.1分(95%可信区间为0至4.2),具有统计学意义(P = 0.05)。文拉法辛缓释片组在第24周的缓解率为27.9%,安慰剂组为18.9%(P = 0.11)。

结论

在为期24周的治疗中,文拉法辛对伴有或不伴有抑郁症的广泛性焦虑障碍患者均有效。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

1
Antidepressants versus placebo for generalised anxiety disorder (GAD).抗抑郁药与安慰剂治疗广泛性焦虑症(GAD)的对比
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jan 30;1(1):CD012942. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012942.pub2.
9
The diagnosis and treatment of generalized anxiety disorder.广泛性焦虑障碍的诊断与治疗。
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2013 Apr;110(17):300-9; quiz 310. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2013.0300. Epub 2013 Apr 26.

本文引用的文献

10
Suicidal ideation in primary care.基层医疗中的自杀意念
J Gen Intern Med. 1996 Aug;11(8):447-53. doi: 10.1007/BF02599038.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验