Suppr超能文献

紧张型头痛的诊断、流行病学及影响

Diagnosis, epidemiology, and impact of tension-type headache.

作者信息

Jensen Rigmor

机构信息

Danish Headache Center, Department of Neurology, University of Copenhagen, DK-2600 Glostrup, Denmark.

出版信息

Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2003 Dec;7(6):455-9. doi: 10.1007/s11916-003-0061-x.

Abstract

Although tension-type headache is the most prevalent headache and affects 78% of the general population, the substantial societal and individual burden associated with this primary headache has been overlooked. In contrast to migraine headache, there has been limited focus on tension-type headache. Most patients with the chronic form of tension-type headache, which affects 3% of the population, are left virtually without any specific treatment. Chronic tension-type headache differs from the episodic form in frequency, lack of effect to most treatment strategies, more medication overuse, and more loss of quality of life. Daily or near daily headaches also constitute a major diagnostic and therapeutic problem and distinguishing chronic tension-type headache from migraine headache and from medication-induced headache is a substantial diagnostic challenge because management strategies are completely different. Considerable benefits for the society can be gained by specific strategies leading to reductions in the amount of sickness absence and impaired working abilities. The burden on the affected patients' and their families' quality of life also may be improved by a general acceptance of the disorder and by the development of a specific treatment strategy.

摘要

尽管紧张型头痛是最常见的头痛类型,影响着78%的普通人群,但这种原发性头痛所带来的巨大社会和个人负担却一直被忽视。与偏头痛相比,对紧张型头痛的关注有限。大多数患有慢性紧张型头痛(影响3%的人口)的患者几乎没有任何特效治疗方法。慢性紧张型头痛在发作频率、对大多数治疗策略无效、更多药物滥用以及生活质量下降方面与发作性紧张型头痛不同。每日或几乎每日发作的头痛也是一个主要的诊断和治疗难题,将慢性紧张型头痛与偏头痛以及药物性头痛区分开来是一项重大的诊断挑战,因为管理策略完全不同。通过采取特定策略减少病假天数和工作能力受损,可为社会带来可观的益处。普遍认识这种疾病并制定特定的治疗策略,也可能改善受影响患者及其家庭的生活质量负担。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验