Tohen Mauricio, Vieta Eduard, Calabrese Joseph, Ketter Terence A, Sachs Gary, Bowden Charles, Mitchell Philip B, Centorrino Franca, Risser Richard, Baker Robert W, Evans Angela R, Beymer Karin, Dube Sanjay, Tollefson Gary D, Breier Alan
Lilly Research Laboratories, Indianapolis, IN 46285, USA.
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2003 Nov;60(11):1079-88. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.60.11.1079.
Despite the longer duration of the depressive phase in bipolar disorder and the frequent clinical use of antidepressants combined with antipsychotics or mood stabilizers, relatively few controlled studies have examined treatment strategies for bipolar depression.
To examine the use of olanzapine and olanzapine-fluoxetine combination in the treatment of bipolar I depression.
Double-blind, 8-week, randomized controlled trial.
Eighty-four sites (inpatient and outpatient) in 13 countries. Patients A total of 833 randomized adults with bipolar I depression with a Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) score of at least 20. Intervention Patients were randomly assigned to receive placebo (n = 377); olanzapine, 5 to 20 mg/d (n = 370); or olanzapine-fluoxetine combination, 6 and 25, 6 and 50, or 12 and 50 mg/d (n = 86).
Changes in MADRS total scores using mixed-effects model repeated-measures analyses.
During all 8 study weeks, the olanzapine and olanzapine-fluoxetine groups showed statistically significant improvement in depressive symptoms vs the placebo group (P<.001 for all). The olanzapine-fluoxetine group also showed statistically greater improvement than the olanzapine group at weeks 4 through 8. At week 8, MADRS total scores were lower than at baseline by 11.9, 15.0, and 18.5 points in the placebo, olanzapine, and olanzapine-fluoxetine groups, respectively. Remission criteria were met by 24.5% (87/355) of the placebo group, 32.8% (115/351) of the olanzapine group, and 48.8% (40/82) of the olanzapine-fluoxetine group. Treatment-emergent mania (Young Mania Rating Scale score <15 at baseline and > or =15 subsequently) did not differ among groups (placebo, 6.7% [23/345]; olanzapine, 5.7% [19/335]; and olanzapine-fluoxetine, 6.4% [5/78]). Adverse events for olanzapine-fluoxetine therapy were similar to those for olanzapine therapy but also included higher rates of nausea and diarrhea.
Olanzapine is more effective than placebo, and combined olanzapine-fluoxetine is more effective than olanzapine and placebo in the treatment of bipolar I depression without increased risk of developing manic symptoms.
尽管双相情感障碍抑郁期持续时间较长,且临床上常将抗抑郁药与抗精神病药或心境稳定剂联合使用,但相对较少的对照研究探讨过双相抑郁的治疗策略。
探讨奥氮平及奥氮平-氟西汀联合用药治疗双相I型抑郁的疗效。
双盲、为期8周的随机对照试验。
13个国家的84个研究点(包括住院部和门诊部)。患者:共833例随机分组的成年双相I型抑郁患者,蒙哥马利-阿斯伯格抑郁评定量表(MADRS)评分至少为20分。干预措施:患者被随机分配接受安慰剂(n = 377);奥氮平,5至20mg/d(n = 370);或奥氮平-氟西汀联合用药,6和25mg/d、6和50mg/d或12和50mg/d(n = 86)。
采用混合效应模型重复测量分析MADRS总分的变化。
在整个8周的研究期间,奥氮平组和奥氮平-氟西汀组的抑郁症状改善程度在统计学上显著优于安慰剂组(所有P值均<0.001)。奥氮平-氟西汀组在第4至8周的改善程度在统计学上也显著优于奥氮平组。在第8周时,安慰剂组、奥氮平组和奥氮平-氟西汀组的MADRS总分分别比基线水平降低了11.9、15.0和18.5分。安慰剂组、奥氮平组和奥氮平-氟西汀组达到缓解标准的比例分别为24.5%(87/355)、32.8%(115/351)和48.8%(40/82)。治疗中出现的躁狂(青年躁狂评定量表评分在基线时<15分,随后≥15分)在各组间无差异(安慰剂组为6.7%[23/345];奥氮平组为5.7%[19/335];奥氮平-氟西汀组为6.4%[5/78])。奥氮平-氟西汀治疗的不良事件与奥氮平治疗相似,但恶心和腹泻的发生率更高。
在治疗双相I型抑郁时,奥氮平比安慰剂更有效,奥氮平-氟西汀联合用药比奥氮平和安慰剂更有效,且不会增加出现躁狂症状的风险。