Department of Psychiatry, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China.
National Clinical Research Center for Mental Disorders, Changsha, China.
Can J Psychiatry. 2023 Jan;68(1):22-32. doi: 10.1177/07067437221078646. Epub 2022 Mar 4.
Up to 70%-80% of patients with bipolar disorder are misdiagnosed as having major depressive disorder (MDD), leading to both delayed intervention and worsening disability. Differences in the cognitive neurophysiology may serve to distinguish between the depressive phase of type 1 bipolar disorder (BDD-I) from MDD, though this remains to be demonstrated. To this end, we investigate the discriminatory signal in the topological organization of the functional connectome during a working memory (WM) task in BDD-I and MDD, as a candidate identification approach.
We calculated and compared the degree centrality (DC) at the whole-brain voxel-wise level in 31 patients with BDD-I, 35 patients with MDD, and 80 healthy controls (HCs) during an n-back task. We further extracted the distinct DC patterns in the two patient groups under different WM loads and used machine learning approaches to determine the distinguishing ability of the DC map.
Patients with BDD-I had lower accuracy and longer reaction time (RT) than HCs at high WM loads. BDD-I is characterized by decreased DC in the default mode network (DMN) and the sensorimotor network (SMN) when facing high WM load. In contrast, MDD is characterized by increased DC in the DMN during high WM load. Higher WM load resulted in better classification performance, with the distinct aberrant DC maps under 2-back load discriminating the two disorders with 90.91% accuracy.
The distributed brain connectivity during high WM load provides novel insights into the neurophysiological mechanisms underlying cognitive impairment of depression. This could potentially distinguish BDD-I from MDD if replicated in future large-scale evaluations of first-episode depression with longitudinal confirmation of diagnostic transition.
多达 70%-80%的双相情感障碍患者被误诊为重度抑郁症 (MDD),导致干预延迟和残疾恶化。认知神经生理学的差异可能有助于区分 1 型双相情感障碍 (BDD-I) 的抑郁期和 MDD,但这仍有待证明。为此,我们在 BDD-I 和 MDD 的工作记忆 (WM) 任务中研究了功能连接组拓扑组织中的鉴别信号,作为一种候选识别方法。
我们在 n-back 任务中计算并比较了 31 名 BDD-I 患者、35 名 MDD 患者和 80 名健康对照者(HCs)在全脑体素水平的度中心度(DC)。我们进一步提取了两个患者组在不同 WM 负荷下的不同 DC 模式,并使用机器学习方法确定 DC 图谱的鉴别能力。
BDD-I 患者在高 WM 负荷下的准确性较低,反应时间 (RT) 较长。BDD-I 的特点是在面对高 WM 负荷时,默认模式网络 (DMN) 和感觉运动网络 (SMN) 的 DC 降低。相比之下,MDD 的特点是在高 WM 负荷时 DMN 的 DC 增加。较高的 WM 负荷导致更好的分类性能,在 2 次负荷下的明显异常 DC 图谱可区分两种疾病,准确率为 90.91%。
高 WM 负荷时的分布式大脑连接为理解抑郁认知障碍的神经生理机制提供了新的见解。如果在未来对首发抑郁症进行大规模评估,并对诊断转变进行纵向确认,这种方法可能会区分 BDD-I 和 MDD。