• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用儿童特异性IgE浓度预测荞麦过敏

Prediction of buckwheat allergy using specific IgE concentrations in children.

作者信息

Sohn M H, Lee S Y, Kim K-E

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics and Institute of Allergy, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Allergy. 2003 Dec;58(12):1308-10. doi: 10.1046/j.1398-9995.2003.00339.x.

DOI:10.1046/j.1398-9995.2003.00339.x
PMID:14616108
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Buckwheat (BW) is considered to be one of the most important food allergens, and positive skin tests are found in about 5% of Koreans. We investigated the positive and negative predictive values of BW-specific IgE in subjects with a BW allergy in order to reduce the need for buckwheat challenge, which can be more riskier than other causes of food allergies.

METHODS

Twenty-eight BW allergic subjects with symptoms after BW Open food challenge and 16 asymptomatic control subjects with positive skin test to BW were recruited. Serum samples from all patients were analyzed for BW-specific IgE antibodies using the Pharmacia CAP System.

RESULTS

According to the receiver operator characteristic (ROC) analysis, the optimal cutoff level of BW-specific IgE, as the definitions of serum BW-specific IgE positive, was 1.26 kUA/l. With this selected cutoff level, the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values were 93.10, 93.33, 79.75 and 97.96%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The use of the optimal cutoff level, 1.26 kUA/l, that simultaneously maximizes sensitivity and specificity, would be helpful for avoiding unnecessary risky challenge in children with a strong clinical history and skin test responses.

摘要

引言

荞麦(BW)被认为是最重要的食物过敏原之一,约5%的韩国人皮肤试验呈阳性。我们调查了BW特异性IgE在BW过敏受试者中的阳性和阴性预测值,以减少荞麦激发试验的必要性,该试验可能比其他食物过敏原因更具风险。

方法

招募了28名在BW开放食物激发试验后出现症状的BW过敏受试者和16名对BW皮肤试验呈阳性的无症状对照受试者。使用Pharmacia CAP系统分析所有患者的血清样本中的BW特异性IgE抗体。

结果

根据受试者工作特征(ROC)分析,作为血清BW特异性IgE阳性定义的BW特异性IgE的最佳截断水平为1.26 kUA/l。采用该选定的截断水平时,敏感性、特异性、阳性和阴性预测值分别为93.10%、93.33%、79.75%和97.96%。

结论

使用同时使敏感性和特异性最大化的最佳截断水平1.26 kUA/l,将有助于避免对有强烈临床病史和皮肤试验反应的儿童进行不必要的风险激发试验。

相似文献

1
Prediction of buckwheat allergy using specific IgE concentrations in children.利用儿童特异性IgE浓度预测荞麦过敏
Allergy. 2003 Dec;58(12):1308-10. doi: 10.1046/j.1398-9995.2003.00339.x.
2
Buckwheat Allergy in Asia.亚洲的荞麦过敏。
Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2024 Sep;24(9):549-557. doi: 10.1007/s11882-024-01166-6. Epub 2024 Jul 8.
3
Application of the 16-kDa buckwheat 2 S storage albumin protein for diagnosis of clinical reactivity.16 kDa荞麦2S贮藏白蛋白在临床反应性诊断中的应用。
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2007 Sep;99(3):254-60. doi: 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)60661-8.
4
Relationship between food-specific IgE concentrations and the risk of positive food challenges in children and adolescents.儿童和青少年食物特异性IgE浓度与食物激发试验阳性风险之间的关系。
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1997 Oct;100(4):444-51. doi: 10.1016/s0091-6749(97)70133-7.
5
Identification and characterization of the major allergens of buckwheat.荞麦主要过敏原的鉴定与表征
Allergy. 2000 Nov;55(11):1035-41. doi: 10.1034/j.1398-9995.2000.00763.x.
6
Skin prick test is more useful than specific IgE for diagnosis of buckwheat allergy: A retrospective cross-sectional study.皮肤点刺试验在荞麦过敏诊断中比特异性IgE更有用:一项回顾性横断面研究。
Allergol Int. 2018 Jan;67(1):67-71. doi: 10.1016/j.alit.2017.04.005. Epub 2017 May 4.
7
Specific IgE Decision Point Cutoffs in Children with IgE-Mediated Wheat Allergy and a Review of the Literature.IgE介导的小麦过敏儿童的特异性IgE决策点临界值及文献综述
Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2020;181(4):296-300. doi: 10.1159/000505728. Epub 2020 Feb 18.
8
Usability of Fag e 2 ImmunoCAP in the diagnosis of buckwheat allergy.Fag e 2 ImmunoCAP 在诊断荞麦过敏中的可用性。
Arch Dermatol Res. 2011 Nov;303(9):635-42. doi: 10.1007/s00403-011-1142-z. Epub 2011 Apr 3.
9
Predictor of buckwheat allergy in children based on challenge test results: a retrospective observational study in Japan.基于激发试验结果预测儿童荞麦过敏的因素:日本的一项回顾性观察研究。
Eur Ann Allergy Clin Immunol. 2022 Jul;54(4):183-188. doi: 10.23822/EurAnnACI.1764-1489.224. Epub 2021 Jul 5.
10
Skin prick test responses and allergen-specific IgE levels as predictors of peanut, egg, and sesame allergy in infants.皮肤点刺试验反应和过敏原特异性 IgE 水平可预测婴儿花生、鸡蛋和芝麻过敏。
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2013 Oct;132(4):874-80. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2013.05.038. Epub 2013 Jul 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Buckwheat Allergy in Asia.亚洲的荞麦过敏。
Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2024 Sep;24(9):549-557. doi: 10.1007/s11882-024-01166-6. Epub 2024 Jul 8.
2
IgE-mediated food allergies in children: prevalence, triggers, and management.儿童IgE介导的食物过敏:患病率、触发因素及管理
Korean J Pediatr. 2017 Apr;60(4):99-105. doi: 10.3345/kjp.2017.60.4.99. Epub 2017 Apr 25.
3
Reactions of Buckwheat-Hypersensitive Patients during Oral Food Challenge Are Rare, but Often Anaphylactic.荞麦过敏患者在口服食物激发试验期间的反应罕见,但常为过敏反应。
Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2017;172(2):116-122. doi: 10.1159/000456008. Epub 2017 Mar 8.
4
Clinical and laboratory findings of childhood buckwheat allergy in a single tertiary hospital.一家三级医院儿童荞麦过敏的临床及实验室检查结果
Korean J Pediatr. 2016 Oct;59(10):402-407. doi: 10.3345/kjp.2016.59.10.402. Epub 2016 Oct 17.
5
Significance of 40-, 45-, and 48-kDa Proteins in the Moderate-to-Severe Clinical Symptoms of Buckwheat Allergy.荞麦过敏中等到严重临床症状与 40、45 和 48kDa 蛋白的关系
Allergy Asthma Immunol Res. 2015 Jan;7(1):37-43. doi: 10.4168/aair.2015.7.1.37. Epub 2014 Sep 26.
6
IgE mediated food allergy in Korean children: focused on plant food allergy.韩国儿童中IgE介导的食物过敏:聚焦于植物性食物过敏。
Asia Pac Allergy. 2013 Jan;3(1):15-22. doi: 10.5415/apallergy.2013.3.1.15. Epub 2013 Jan 22.
7
Food allergy-lessons from Asia.亚洲的食物过敏教训。
World Allergy Organ J. 2008 Jul;1(7):129-33. doi: 10.1097/WOX.0b013e31817b7431.
8
Buckwheat allergy: a potential problem in 21st century Britain.荞麦过敏:21世纪英国的一个潜在问题。
BMJ Case Rep. 2011 Nov 8;2011:bcr0920114882. doi: 10.1136/bcr.09.2011.4882.