Suppr超能文献

肿瘤性疾病患儿中Broviac导管的感染风险:配对分析

Infectious risks of Broviac catheters in children with neoplastic diseases: a matched pairs analysis.

作者信息

Harms D, Görtitz I, Lambrecht W, Kabisch H, Erttmann R, Janka-Schaub G

机构信息

Children's Hospital, University of Hamburg, Germany.

出版信息

Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1992 Dec;11(12):1014-8. doi: 10.1097/00006454-199211120-00005.

Abstract

In the present study the complication rate of Broviac catheters in the therapy of children with cancer was determined. Of special interest was the question of to what extent the incidence of bacteremias is increased by the implant. For this reason the method of matched pairs analysis was chosen comparing 55 patients with 61 catheters to 1 child each who received the therapy via peripheral veins. Apart from having the same disease, the same therapy protocol and the same age group the partners had a similar number of leukocytopenic days (leukocyte counts, < 1000/microliters) in the study period. The observation time was 9671 days in the catheter group and 9666 days in the control group. During this time 167 fever episodes (17.7 episodes/1000 days) were recorded in the patients with implant but only 133 episodes (14.0/1000 days) in the control patients. Study and control groups had similar frequencies of fever of unknown origin with leukocyte counts > or = 1000/microliters and fever with a known focus. However, 29 bacteremias (2.9 episodes/1000 days) represented a 4 times higher complication rate with the use of Broviac catheters than in the control group (7 bacteremias, 0.7 episode/1000 days). Episodes of fever of unknown origin with leukocytopenia were 1.5 times more common in the catheter group than in the control group. Although it is not possible to prove that the catheter played a role as focus of bacterial infection, an increased risk of infection must be supposed. The Broviac catheter meets with broad approval by the patients, parents and medical staff.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

在本研究中,确定了布罗维阿克导管在癌症患儿治疗中的并发症发生率。特别令人感兴趣的问题是植入该导管会在多大程度上增加菌血症的发生率。因此,选择了配对分析方法,将55例使用61根导管的患者与1例通过外周静脉接受治疗的患儿进行比较。除了患有相同疾病、采用相同治疗方案和处于相同年龄组外,配对对象在研究期间的白细胞减少天数(白细胞计数<1000/微升)也相似。导管组的观察时间为9671天,对照组为9666天。在此期间,植入导管的患者记录到167次发热发作(17.7次/1000天),而对照组患者仅133次发作(14.0次/1000天)。研究组和对照组不明原因发热(白细胞计数≥1000/微升)和已知病灶发热的频率相似。然而,29例菌血症(2.9次/1000天)表明,使用布罗维阿克导管的并发症发生率比对照组(7例菌血症,0.7次/1000天)高4倍。导管组白细胞减少时不明原因发热发作次数比对照组多1.5倍。虽然无法证明导管是细菌感染的病灶,但必须假定感染风险增加。布罗维阿克导管得到了患者、家长和医护人员的广泛认可。(摘要截选至250词)

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验