Gobet Fernand, Waters Andrew J
School of Psychology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, England.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2003 Nov;29(6):1082-94. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.29.6.1082.
A great deal of research has been devoted to developing process models of expert memory. However, K. J. Vicente and J. H. Wang (1998) proposed (a) that process theories do not provide an adequate account of expert recall in domains in which memory recall is a contrived task and (b) that a product theory, the constraint attunement hypothesis (CAH), has received a significant amount of empirical support. We compared 1 process theory (the template theory; TT; F. Gobet & H. A. Simon, 1996c) with the CAH in chess. Chess players (N=36) differing widely in skill levels were required to recall briefly presented chess positions that were randomized in various ways. Consistent with TT, but inconsistent with the CAH, there was a significant skill effect in a condition in which both the location and distribution of the pieces were randomized. These and other results suggest that process models such as TT can provide a viable account of expert memory in chess.
大量研究致力于开发专家记忆的过程模型。然而,K. J. 维森特和J. H. 王(1998年)提出:(a)在记忆回忆是一项人为设定任务的领域中,过程理论无法充分解释专家的回忆;(b)一种产物理论,即约束协调假说(CAH),已获得大量实证支持。我们在国际象棋领域将一种过程理论(模板理论;TT;F. 戈贝特和H. A. 西蒙,1996年c)与CAH进行了比较。要求技能水平差异很大的国际象棋棋手(N = 36)回忆以各种方式随机呈现的简短棋局。与TT一致,但与CAH不一致的是,在棋子的位置和分布都被随机化的情况下,存在显著的技能效应。这些结果以及其他结果表明,诸如TT这样的过程模型能够为国际象棋中的专家记忆提供一个可行的解释。