Suppr超能文献

晚期姑息家庭护理:亲属的观点。

Advanced palliative home care: next-of-kin's perspective.

作者信息

Milberg Anna, Strang Peter, Carlsson Maria, Börjesson Susanne

机构信息

Linköpings Universitet, Division of Geriatrics and Palliative Research Unit, Linköping, Sweden.

出版信息

J Palliat Med. 2003 Oct;6(5):749-56. doi: 10.1089/109662103322515257.

Abstract

GOALS

(1). To describe what aspects are important when next-of-kin evaluate advanced palliative home care (APHC) and (2). to compare the expressed aspects and describe eventual differences among the three settings, which differed in terms of length of services, geographic location, and population size.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Four to 7 months after the patient's death (87% from cancer), 217 consecutive next-of-kin from three different settings in Sweden responded (response rate 86%) to three open-ended questions via a postal questionnaire. Qualitative content analysis was performed.

MAIN RESULTS

Service aspects and comfort emerged as main categories. The staff's competence, attitude and communication, accessibility, and spectrum of services were valued service aspects. Comfort, such as feeling secure, was another important aspect and it concerned the next-of-kin themselves, the patients, and the families. Additionally, comfort was related to interactional issues such as being in the center and sharing caring with the staff. The actual place of care (i.e., being at home) added to the perceived comfort. Of the respondents, 87% described positive aspects of APHC and 28% negative aspects. No major differences were found among the different settings.

CONCLUSIONS

Next-of-kin incorporate service aspects and aspects relating to the patient's and family's comfort when evaluating APHC. The importance of these aspects is discussed in relation to the content of palliative care and potential goals.

摘要

目标

(1)描述亲属评估晚期姑息家庭护理(APHC)时哪些方面很重要;(2)比较所表达的方面,并描述三种不同服务时长、地理位置和人口规模的机构之间可能存在的差异。

对象与方法

在患者去世后4至7个月(87%为癌症患者),瑞典三个不同机构的217名亲属(回复率86%)通过邮寄问卷回答了三个开放式问题。进行了定性内容分析。

主要结果

服务方面和舒适度成为主要类别。工作人员的能力、态度和沟通、可及性以及服务范围是被看重的服务方面。舒适度,比如感到安心,是另一个重要方面,它涉及亲属自身、患者和家庭。此外,舒适度与互动问题有关,比如处于中心地位以及与工作人员分担护理工作。实际的护理地点(即在家中)增加了感知到的舒适度。在受访者中,87%描述了APHC的积极方面,28%描述了消极方面。不同机构之间未发现重大差异。

结论

亲属在评估APHC时纳入了服务方面以及与患者和家庭舒适度相关的方面。这些方面的重要性结合姑息治疗的内容和潜在目标进行了讨论。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验