Throckmorton Thomas W, Hilibrand Alan S, Mencio Gregory A, Hodge Arleen, Spengler Dan M
The Vanderbilt University Spine Center, Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003 Nov 15;28(22):2546-50. doi: 10.1097/01.BRS.0000092340.24070.F3.
A retrospective review of patient outcomes after lumbar spinal fusion.
To determine whether patients with a fusion ending adjacent to a "degenerated disc" (DDD group) had worse clinical outcomes than patients with fusions ending adjacent to "normal" discs (NL group).
Although it has been suggested that creating a rigid motion segment adjacent to a degenerated segment may negatively impact clinical outcomes after lumbar fusion, this question has not been addressed to our knowledge in the English literature.
Twenty-five consecutive patients treated with lumbar fusion for degenerative instability who had preoperative lumbar spine magnetic resonance imaging, who completed health status questionnaire Short Form 36 (SF-36), and were seen in the office for radiographic follow-up at least 2 years following surgical treatment formed the study group. The magnetic resonance images were reviewed independently by two spine surgeons and rated for the presence of any degenerative changes. Statistical analysis of the SF-36 data was performed with chi2 and Mann-Whitney U testing.
Of the 25 patients, 20 were fused adjacent to at least one degenerated level (DDD group), whereas 5 were fused adjacent to a normal level (NL group). At follow-up, SF-36 scores were higher for the DDD group in all eight subgroups, contrary to the research hypothesis. A power analysis demonstrated with at least 98% certainty that if patients in the DDD group had even a 10% lower score in any of the 8 SF-36 subgroups, this study would have detected it.
This retrospective review of patients who underwent lumbar fusion for degenerative instability demonstrated no adverse impact on clinical outcomes when the lumbar fusion ended adjacent to a degenerative motion segment. Although a power analysis validated these results with 98% certainty, larger prospective studies are needed to confirm that there is no benefit to include degenerated adjacent segments in a lumbar fusion for degenerative instability.
对腰椎融合术后患者结局的回顾性研究。
确定融合节段临近“退变椎间盘”的患者(DDD组)与融合节段临近“正常”椎间盘的患者(NL组)相比,临床结局是否更差。
尽管有人提出在退变节段临近处创建一个刚性运动节段可能会对腰椎融合术后的临床结局产生负面影响,但据我们所知,英文文献中尚未探讨过这个问题。
连续25例因退行性不稳接受腰椎融合治疗的患者纳入研究组,这些患者术前均行腰椎磁共振成像检查,完成了健康状况调查问卷简表36(SF-36),并在手术治疗后至少2年在门诊接受影像学随访。两位脊柱外科医生独立复查磁共振图像,并对是否存在任何退变改变进行评分。对SF-36数据进行卡方检验和曼-惠特尼U检验的统计分析。
25例患者中,20例融合节段至少临近一个退变节段(DDD组),而另外5例融合节段临近正常节段(NL组)。随访时,与研究假设相反,DDD组在所有8个亚组中的SF-36评分均更高。一项效能分析显示,至少有98%的把握度,如果DDD组患者在8个SF-36亚组中的任何一个亚组得分低10%,本研究都能检测到。
这项对因退行性不稳接受腰椎融合治疗患者的回顾性研究表明,当腰椎融合节段临近退变运动节段时,对临床结局没有不利影响。尽管效能分析以98%的把握度验证了这些结果,但仍需要更大规模的前瞻性研究来证实,在因退行性不稳进行腰椎融合时,纳入临近退变节段并无益处。