Crosby Faye J, Franco Jamie L
Department of Psychology, University of California, Santa Cruz 95064, USA.
Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2003;7(4):363-73. doi: 10.1207/s15327957pspr0704_08.
This article seeks to combine the social psychologist's interest in articulating and testing concepts with the public policymaker's interest in the effective implementation of specific policies and programs. The first part of the article applies knowledge about distributive and procedural justice to understanding some of the opposition to affirmative action. The application also reveals some lacunae-specifically concerning rule change-in how social psychologists have looked at procedural justice issues. In the second part of the article, we discuss the problem of rule change and propose a set of conceptualizations about the conditions that govern people's reactions to rule change. We end by reflecting on some changes in our studies of procedural justice.
