Rydén A, Sullivan M, Torgerson J S, Karlsson J, Lindroos A-K, Taft C
Health Care Research Unit, Institute of Internal Medicine, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Göteborg University, Sweden.
Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2003 Dec;27(12):1534-40. doi: 10.1038/sj.ijo.0802460.
The primary purpose was to assess personality trait differences between the severely obese seeking treatment and a mainly non-obese reference group. We also investigated gender differences and differences between obese patients and obese not seeking treatment.
Personality traits were assessed using 7 of 15 scales from the Karolinska Scales of Personality (KSP): Somatic Anxiety, Muscular Tension, Psychastenia, Psychic Anxiety, Monotony Avoidance, Impulsiveness, and Irritability. Patients from the Swedish Obese Subjects (SOS) intervention study (n=3270, ages 37-57, 71% women) and the SOS reference study (n=1135, 54% women) completed the survey. Data presented in this study were gathered prior to treatment. Significance tests and effects sizes were calculated.
Although statistically significant differences were found between obese patients and reference subjects on nearly all personality traits, effect sizes were at most moderate. Of the three scales with moderate effects sizes, differences on Somatic Anxiety and Psychastenia could be traced to items tapping condition-specific symptoms, e.g., problems with sweating and breathing as indicators of Somatic Anxiety. Moderate differences on the Impulsiveness scale (men alone) could not be explained by item composition. Further, the obese patients differed from obese in the reference group, and both obese and reference women reported significantly higher levels on Somatic Anxiety, Muscular Tension and Psychic Anxiety compared to men (effect size: small).
Our results provided no evidence of a general obese personality profile, instead considerable heterogeneity in personality traits was observed across our obese samples (treatment seekers vs non-seekers, men vs women) and generally only small differences were noted compared to a reference study population. Further research is needed to investigate if the somewhat elevated levels of Impulsiveness, particularly among male obese patients, is affected by weight loss. When assessing personality traits in diseased groups consideration should be given to possible confounding from, e.g., somatic symptoms.
主要目的是评估寻求治疗的重度肥胖者与主要为非肥胖的参照组之间的人格特质差异。我们还研究了性别差异以及肥胖患者与未寻求治疗的肥胖者之间的差异。
使用卡罗林斯卡人格量表(KSP)15个分量表中的7个来评估人格特质:躯体焦虑、肌肉紧张、精神衰弱、心理焦虑、避免单调、冲动性和易怒性。来自瑞典肥胖受试者(SOS)干预研究(n = 3270,年龄37 - 57岁,71%为女性)和SOS参照研究(n = 1135,54%为女性)的患者完成了调查。本研究中的数据是在治疗前收集的。计算了显著性检验和效应量。
尽管在几乎所有人格特质上,肥胖患者与参照对象之间都发现了具有统计学意义的差异,但效应量至多为中等。在效应量中等的三个分量表中,躯体焦虑和精神衰弱方面的差异可追溯到反映特定状况症状的条目,例如出汗和呼吸问题作为躯体焦虑的指标。冲动性分量表上的中等差异(仅男性)无法通过条目构成来解释。此外,肥胖患者与参照组中的肥胖者不同,并且肥胖女性和参照女性在躯体焦虑、肌肉紧张和心理焦虑方面的得分均显著高于男性(效应量:小)。
我们的结果没有提供存在一般肥胖人格特征的证据,相反,在我们的肥胖样本(寻求治疗者与未寻求治疗者、男性与女性)中观察到人格特质存在相当大的异质性,与参照研究人群相比,通常仅发现了微小差异。需要进一步研究来调查冲动性水平略有升高,特别是男性肥胖患者中的冲动性升高,是否会受到体重减轻的影响。在评估患病群体的人格特质时,应考虑到例如躯体症状等可能的混杂因素。