Kuwahara Reiichiro, Kumashiro Ryukichi, Murashima Shiro, Ogata Kei, Tanaka Kazuo, Hisamochi Akiko, Hino Teruko, Ide Tatsuya, Tanaka Eisuke, Koga Yuriko, Sata Michio
The Second Department of Medicine, Kurume University School of Medicine, Kurume, Japan.
J Med Virol. 2004 Jan;72(1):26-34. doi: 10.1002/jmv.10558.
It has been reported that spontaneous or interferon (IFN)-induced hepatitis B e (HBe) seroconversion has usually been associated with the development of a stop codon in the precore region. However, the difference between lamivudine-induced seroconversion and spontaneous or IFN-induced seroconversion is not known. The aim of this study was to investigate the correlation between the evolution of the precore and core promoter mutations and lamivudine-induced seroconversion. Forty-five patients with chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection who were treated with lamivudine for more than 1 year were enrolled. The nucleotide sequence of the precore and core promoter region was determined before and after treatment with lamivudine for 1 year. Among 29 patients who were hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-positive before treatment, 12 (41.3%) lost HBeAg during the course of treatment for 1 year. Of these, eight patients (66.7%) still had precore wild type HBV after 1 year. After 1 year, reversion to precore wild type HBV was detected in 11 (64.7%) of 17 patients who had precore mutant HBV before treatment. Twelve (70.6%) of 17 patients who were persistently HBeAg-positive had precore wild type HBV before and after treatment for 1 year. Despite the loss of HBeAg, two thirds of the patients still had precore wild type HBV after the 1-year treatment. It is suggested that lamivudine-induced seroconversion differs from spontaneous or IFN-induced seroconversion in the change of nucleotides in the precore region. The reversion in the precore region may be caused by the difference of drug-susceptibility to lamivudine. The antiviral effect of lamivudine may be more effective in the precore mutant HBV than in the precore wild type HBV.
据报道,自发性或干扰素(IFN)诱导的乙肝e抗原(HBe)血清学转换通常与前核心区出现终止密码子有关。然而,拉米夫定诱导的血清学转换与自发性或IFN诱导的血清学转换之间的差异尚不清楚。本研究的目的是调查前核心区和核心启动子突变的演变与拉米夫定诱导的血清学转换之间的相关性。纳入45例接受拉米夫定治疗超过1年的慢性乙型肝炎病毒(HBV)感染患者。在拉米夫定治疗1年前后,测定前核心区和核心启动子区域的核苷酸序列。在治疗前乙肝e抗原(HBeAg)阳性的29例患者中,12例(41.3%)在1年的治疗过程中失去了HBeAg。其中,8例患者(66.7%)在1年后仍为前核心区野生型HBV。1年后,在治疗前为前核心区突变型HBV的17例患者中,有11例(64.7%)检测到前核心区野生型HBV回复。17例持续HBeAg阳性的患者中有12例(70.6%)在治疗1年前后均为前核心区野生型HBV。尽管HBeAg消失,但三分之二的患者在1年治疗后仍为前核心区野生型HBV。提示拉米夫定诱导的血清学转换在前核心区核苷酸变化方面与自发性或IFN诱导的血清学转换不同。前核心区的回复可能是由于对拉米夫定的药物敏感性差异所致。拉米夫定对前核心区突变型HBV的抗病毒作用可能比对前核心区野生型HBV更有效。