Beal Daniel J, Cohen Robin R, Burke Michael J, McLendon Christy L
Military Family Research Institute, Purdue University, 14 North 2nd Street, Suite 300, Lafayette, IN 47901, USA.
J Appl Psychol. 2003 Dec;88(6):989-1004. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.88.6.989.
Previous meta-analytic examinations of group cohesion and performance have focused primarily on contextual factors. This study examined issues relevant to applied researchers by providing a more detailed analysis of the criterion domain. In addition, the authors reinvestigated the role of components of cohesion using more modern meta-analytic methods and in light of different types of performance criteria. The results of the authors' meta-analyses revealed stronger correlations between cohesion and performance when performance was defined as behavior (as opposed to outcome), when it was assessed with efficiency measures (as opposed to effectiveness measures), and as patterns of team workflow became more intensive. In addition, and in contrast to B. Mullen and C. Copper's (1994) meta-analysis, the 3 main components of cohesion were independently related to the various performance domains. Implications for organizations and future research on cohesion and performance are discussed.
以往关于团队凝聚力与绩效的元分析研究主要集中在情境因素上。本研究通过对标准领域进行更详细的分析,探讨了与应用研究人员相关的问题。此外,作者运用更现代的元分析方法,并根据不同类型的绩效标准,重新研究了凝聚力各组成部分的作用。作者的元分析结果显示,当绩效被定义为行为(而非结果)时,当用效率指标(而非效果指标)进行评估时,以及随着团队工作流程模式变得更加密集时,凝聚力与绩效之间的相关性更强。此外,与B. 马伦和C. 库珀(1994年)的元分析不同,凝聚力的3个主要组成部分与各个绩效领域独立相关。文中讨论了对组织以及未来关于凝聚力与绩效研究的启示。