• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

护士长与在职护士进行的能力评估比较。

Comparison of competence assessments made by nurse managers and practising nurses.

作者信息

Meretoja Riitta, Leino-Kilpi Helena

机构信息

Nursing Director, Corporate Headquarters, Hospital District of Helsinki and Uusimaa Professor, Department of Nursing Science, University of Turku, Finland.

出版信息

J Nurs Manag. 2003 Nov;11(6):404-9. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2834.2003.00413.x.

DOI:10.1046/j.1365-2834.2003.00413.x
PMID:14641722
Abstract

This study compares nurse and manager assessments of nurse competence in a university hospital setting. Although managers carry out annual reviews, few studies have examined the agreement between the competence assessments made by practising nurses and their managers. Using a pretested 73-item questionnaire, consisting of seven competence categories, we compared self-assessments and manager assessments of the level of nurse competence on a Visual Analogue Scale of 0-100 and the frequency of using competencies by using statistical analyses. Managers assessed the overall level of competence (70.8 +/- 19.3 vs. 63.9 +/- 13.7) (mean +/- SD) and the level of competence in five competence categories significantly higher than the nurses themselves. A high degree of agreement was found between the assessments for the frequency of using competencies. These results can be used to encourage nurses and to improve the quality of care in different hospital work environments.

摘要

本研究比较了大学医院环境中护士和管理人员对护士能力的评估。尽管管理人员会进行年度评估,但很少有研究考察执业护士及其管理人员所做能力评估之间的一致性。我们使用一份经过预测试的、包含73个项目的问卷(由七个能力类别组成),通过统计分析比较了护士自我评估与管理人员对护士能力水平在0至100视觉模拟量表上的评估,以及能力使用频率的评估。管理人员评估的总体能力水平(70.8 +/- 19.3对63.9 +/- 13.7)(均值 +/- 标准差)以及五个能力类别的能力水平显著高于护士自身。在能力使用频率的评估之间发现了高度一致性。这些结果可用于激励护士,并改善不同医院工作环境中的护理质量。

相似文献

1
Comparison of competence assessments made by nurse managers and practising nurses.护士长与在职护士进行的能力评估比较。
J Nurs Manag. 2003 Nov;11(6):404-9. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2834.2003.00413.x.
2
Comparison of nurse competence in different hospital work environments.不同医院工作环境下护士能力的比较。
J Nurs Manag. 2004 Sep;12(5):329-36. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2834.2004.00422.x.
3
Competence profiles of recently registered nurses working in intensive and emergency settings.在重症和急诊环境中工作的新注册护士的能力概况。
J Nurs Manag. 2007 Nov;15(8):792-800. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2934.2007.00768.x.
4
Nurse competence scale: development and psychometric testing.护士能力量表:编制与心理测量学测试
J Adv Nurs. 2004 Jul;47(2):124-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2004.03071.x.
5
Relating new graduate nurse competence to frequency of use.将新毕业护士的能力与使用频率联系起来。
Collegian. 2008;15(2):69-76. doi: 10.1016/j.colegn.2008.02.003.
6
Developing performance appraisal tool for staff nurses.开发针对护士的绩效评估工具。
Nurs J India. 2009 Feb;100(2):32-4.
7
Critical thinking of nurse managers related to staff RNs' perceptions of the practice environment.护理经理的批判性思维与注册护士对实践环境的看法有关。
J Nurs Scholarsh. 2010 Sep 1;42(3):305-13. doi: 10.1111/j.1547-5069.2010.01354.x.
8
Nurse manager support: what is it? Structures and practices that promote it.护士长支持:是什么?促进其发展的结构与实践。
Nurs Adm Q. 2007 Oct-Dec;31(4):325-40. doi: 10.1097/01.NAQ.0000290430.34066.43.
9
Development of competency inventory for registered nurses in the People's Republic of China: scale development.中华人民共和国注册护士能力量表的开发:量表编制
Int J Nurs Stud. 2007 Jul;44(5):805-13. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2006.01.010. Epub 2006 Mar 7.
10
A qualitative study of barriers and facilitators of the charge nurse role.对责任护士角色的障碍因素和促进因素的定性研究。
Nurs Leadersh Forum. 2003 Summer;7(4):157-64.

引用本文的文献

1
The professional competence of newly graduated nurses in the transition phase as assessed by nurse managers: a descriptive cross-sectional multi-national study.护士长对处于转型期的新毕业护士专业能力的评估:一项描述性横断面多国研究。
J Res Nurs. 2025 Mar 15:17449871241311543. doi: 10.1177/17449871241311543.
2
An Observational Cross-Sectional Analysis of the Correlation between Clinical Competencies and Clinical Reasoning among Italian Registered Nurses.意大利注册护士临床能力与临床推理相关性的观察性横断面分析
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Jul 8;12(13):1357. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12131357.
3
Self-Perceived Clinical Competence of Nurses in Different Working Experiences: A Cross-Sectional Study.
不同工作经验护士的自我感知临床能力:一项横断面研究。
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Oct 24;11(21):2808. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11212808.
4
A structural equation modelling analysis: interprofessional team collaboration, organizational career management, and post competency of community nurses.结构方程模型分析:跨专业团队合作、组织职业管理与社区护士的岗位胜任力。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Apr 1;23(1):327. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09303-z.
5
New graduate registered nurses' professional competence and the impact of preceptors' education intervention: a quasi-experimental longitudinal intervention study.新毕业注册护士的专业能力及带教老师教育干预的影响:一项准实验性纵向干预研究。
BMC Nurs. 2022 Dec 16;21(1):360. doi: 10.1186/s12912-022-01133-4.
6
Correlations between performance and shift work in the nursing activities: a pilot approach.护理活动中的绩效与轮班工作之间的相关性:一种初步方法。
Acta Biomed. 2022 Jul 1;93(3):e2022251. doi: 10.23750/abm.v93i3.12403.
7
A Training Intervention through a 360° Multisource Feedback Model.一项基于 360°多源反馈模型的培训干预措施。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Aug 30;18(17):9137. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18179137.
8
Spiritual Care in Hospitalized Patients in Iran: An Action Research Study.伊朗住院患者的精神关怀:一项行动研究。
J Relig Health. 2022 Oct;61(5):3822-3839. doi: 10.1007/s10943-021-01302-w. Epub 2021 Jun 16.
9
Psychometric Properties of Nursing Manager Communication Competency Questionnaire (CCCQ): An Instrument Design Study.护理经理沟通能力问卷(CCCQ)的心理计量学特性:一种工具设计研究。
Ann Glob Health. 2021 Mar 12;87(1):25. doi: 10.5334/aogh.3272.
10
Evidence of validity of the Competence Scale of Actions of Nurses in Emergencies.护士应急行动能力量表的效度证据。
Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2019 Mar 10;27:e3128. doi: 10.1590/1518-8345.2814.3128.